-
AuthorPosts
-
February 4, 2016 at 11:43 am #577699
Yet another new site in a corporate series for the same client: http://www.furnituremedic.co.uk
With 161 franchisees having custom pages.
Enfold just gets better and better to use.Thanks Team Kriesi.
February 4, 2016 at 11:59 am #577706@jpdesigncomm,
Hey Jeff, really nice use of the slider on the header.
If you compress your background image at http://www.tinyjpg.com it goes from 430kb to 180kb, so I would do that for sure.
Also it has a graphic that says, use our online inquire form, but it doesn’t link anywhere. Was confused by that.What plugin did you use for the Nearest To Me and the Chat?
- This reply was modified 8 years, 9 months ago by millertimesites.
February 4, 2016 at 12:14 pm #577722Thanks for the feedback, it’s appreciated.
I totally forgot to optimise the background image so I’ll see to that.
The online form graphic is used when you find your nearest franchise but obviously I need to make that more clear. It does link to a CF7 form when you’re at your nearest franchise.Find your nearest plugin is the enhanced Store Locator, great once you get the hang of it.
And the online chat is by the Pure Chat plugin, account required.February 7, 2016 at 9:18 pm #579234I am a huge fan of Enfold and my own site was built using it.
http://felipepavao.com/wp-help
Thanks for keeping a good work.
February 8, 2016 at 11:34 am #579497Hello Diezel23!
The static content elements are posts in our case. We made a skin for them where we removed the linking to the detail page. Just duplicate an existing skin or create a new one skin in the “Item Skin Editor“, either way works. Then go to “Layout Composition(Green Icon) -> Tab “Link/SEO” and set “Add Link To:none“. Do the same for the Title and all the other Elements in the skin which usually link to the source. Now you have your own “static” element. For the background image just use the featured image of the post.Hope we could help you out!
All the best
DUALWERK
- This reply was modified 8 years, 9 months ago by DUALWERK.
February 11, 2016 at 1:04 am #581405@boxseven on large screen resolutions your angled design falls apart. I really like the use of the angled image though- what a creative idea.
stretch to fit and it’ll work – add this to the angled image elements and it works like a charm: background-size: 100% 100%;
- This reply was modified 8 years, 9 months ago by ewingmh.
February 11, 2016 at 11:34 am #581548Thanks for letting me know @ewingmh
I will try that, what size screen are you using?
February 11, 2016 at 12:08 pm #581559I done, thanks so much for telling me about this.
That is why I love Enfold, it makes changes like this so easy!
February 11, 2016 at 7:23 pm #581837@boxseven
2560×1400February 11, 2016 at 11:05 pm #581916Hi,
here is my site: http://www.surfiran.com
ThanksFebruary 11, 2016 at 11:07 pm #581918Hey @mehdi360, beautiful site!
Congrats!February 11, 2016 at 11:31 pm #581924@mehdi360 amazing work! One thing I would recommend, get rid of font-weight: bold; on links. Look at the image – red arrow is the current state, blue arrow with font-weight: normal; – i think it looks way better, less blurry.
February 12, 2016 at 4:05 am #581980@boxseven
What are you using for the angled background elements in your stokeydesign website?
I have seen it, and variations, using the Visual Composer editor with Enfold, but it looks like you are using the base Avia editor.
ThanksFebruary 12, 2016 at 1:37 pm #582207Das Enfold-Theme ist großartig! Auch unsere Seite ist nun online: http://www.stadtarchiv-bad-bevensen.de
February 13, 2016 at 6:11 am #582630Hey Everyone…check out our new site built on Enfold. https://hikepos.com.au
It is a website for one of our biggest client who specialises in POS SoftwareFebruary 13, 2016 at 2:12 pm #582715Very good job. Well done!
You should see this: http://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/#!/d4EKeY/https://hikepos.com.au/
Took some time to load and may hurt your client’s conversions.February 15, 2016 at 12:24 am #583042Hi.
Enfold and Kriesi support team helped me create my web property services http://www.arojo.es
Thank you.
Regards
February 15, 2016 at 12:10 pm #583309February 15, 2016 at 1:56 pm #583395Good job @Sigmund, very simple and nice website!
February 15, 2016 at 10:37 pm #583801@hirens – your page load speed is horrible. Have you used EWWW or Imsanity or anything similar to compress your images?
February 16, 2016 at 2:49 am #583858February 16, 2016 at 8:44 am #583956@hirens your images on are very heavy. I tested the first (HIKE-HEADER-IMAGE-v5.jpg) passed on https://compressor.io/compress it goes from 958 KB to 145 KB …
February 16, 2016 at 9:06 am #583965@hirens That’s correct what @freepixelweb say’s; try to reduce the size of the images. With enfold you can achieve great results. Look: http://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/#!/d8tUP3/https://ifra.nl
Frans
February 16, 2016 at 9:21 am #583980Hi @ifrani and @freepixelweb thank you for your input. We initially tried the compression but loss-less compression was not much helpful and lossy compression was something we did not wanted to go with as client requires best graphics on the site. Regarding the speed, we do have a very good speed on .com version, https://hikepos.com – I will have to check why .com.au is facing the issue. Thank you for pointing out. much appreciated.
February 16, 2016 at 9:25 am #583983Hi @ifranl @freepixelweb – Looks like the page speed is back!
February 16, 2016 at 10:58 am #584046HI @hirens, Pingdom the results are strange, home page weighs less than 1MB and the access time is around 7s … hosting seems concerned.
I compare to a customer website with a home page of 2,7Mo that loads in less than 3s.- This reply was modified 8 years, 9 months ago by freepixelweb.
February 16, 2016 at 11:00 am #584049Hi @freepixelweb, I was just looking into it based on your previous suggestion. In Pingdom, it is showing three properties in our website as ‘undefined’ within the waterfall. I am not able to work out what it is. Any thoughts?
http://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/#!/ewyiBC/https://hikepos.com
By the way, we are working on .com domain at the moment to check that and website main image is now compressed as you suggested. Still it seems a lot of load time…
February 16, 2016 at 11:05 am #584052I recommend also checking Google speed insight – as the matter of fact, their score is the most important in the seo aspect:
https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=hikepos.com&tab=desktop
and GtMetrix:
https://gtmetrix.com/reports/hikepos.com/c5CdYH3YScores look nice ;) But as you see, there are still some little issues you could brush up.
February 16, 2016 at 12:24 pm #584103@hirens, effectively you have traces (empty) for images in base64 must verify the content in html text mode.
But looking at the loading characteristics there is a disk access time too long, it comes from the hosting server.February 16, 2016 at 12:30 pm #584104Thanks @freepixelweb for pointing that out. We are using AWS EC2 server. It is a very large server so I am sure capacity is not an issue. I will look into it and probably talk to AWS. Let me know if any thoughts or suggestions regarding EC2 optimisation. Once I sort it out, I will share it here for everyone’s reference.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.