Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I can say that it is breaking, even without the update. For us, LayerSlider seems to have switched to wanting images via ssl, which throws a browser error and a broken image icon for some.
Need to know how widespread this is, as we have a ton of licenses and sites running Enfold.
Sweet! I will look forward to installing and testing tonight or tomorrow. Lots to look forward to from the change log.
-jasonWe saw a break like this for a plug-in not too long ago. Did 4.0 start requiring a newer version of php by chance? That was what undid the other plug-in.
Thank you very much for this! The site we were going to use this for is using a different solution at the moment, but I am eager to try this on our testing site within the next week or so. Thank you for developing this.
It would be really cool to put this in the code snippets section, as it could be helpful to many developers
Thanks again!.
Also, we have disabled almost all plug-ins one-by-one to makes sure none of them are the cause. All WordPress components are up to date, with exception of the newest Enfold. We were just waiting to make sure there were no immediate issues and have a chance to test for compatibility on our testing site first. So at this point, it seems to be narrowed down to WordPress and.or Enfold.
After further testing (trying to disprove other theories), we can confirm it seems to be level-based. Admins always get access to the bar, whereas logging in under any other user level redirects the user to the home page, sans the admin bar. We have tested this in various browsers (Chrome on Mac and Windows, Safari on Mac and iOS, Windows Edge, Windows IE).
After more research and testing, it seems to focus on the level of access. Admins always show the bar (on Mac), but below that, does not seem to show for others. This includes Macs as well.
Note: Please do not disable any plug-ins without checking, first.
Hi Ismael,
I can understand where you are coming from, but would like to point out an issue that happens that lets viewers fall through the cracks: large tablets and television displays.
Because some tablets either have high resolution displays and/or are large in size, the typical media queries used to show mobile menus fail to display, yet because the navbar does not drop-down, they have to click thought every single layer of a menu, page by page. Also, as televisions become displays more and more, we are seeing the same issue. I worry that the singular approach of media width queries does not address the button state changes at all resolutions.
That all said, I would be curious to know what you and the team plan as these types of displays become more of the norm than the exception. We are already at that crossroads here and would like to have some sort of idea on what the road forward can be.
Sorry, I can see how it probably does not sound clear. I was talking about button state control. On desktops, there are multiple states of a button, allowing for hoer, click, active, etc. Because mobiles and tablets have button states that are more in tune with either on or off, a menu drop-down fails to work on mobile or tablet platforms.
I have seen it where that menu will switch to being an onHover display to an onClick display. I cannot remember where I saw it. I swore it was done on an Enfold-based site. Can there be a function that replaces the button states when it senses a mobile or tablet platform?
We just ran into this as well. Need to display the post grid and have stickies at the beginning. Not even sure ho I can hack it to get both in the same place. In this case, a city needs an official notice to stay at the front of the list for 6 weeks. Not sure why it is not possible, as it is part of the basic WP themes. Otherwise, people with these needs have to either give up a nice, ordered system, or make a separate grid area and have a bunch of awkward space (trapped white space).
Why can’t there be a checkbox to search first sticky posts, then display remainder in selected order?
This is starting to appear on our sites as well. Some do indeed have SSL, but some do not. They get the same error. Just started happening about a month ago. Trying to get some sort of pattern to figure out the cause. Flushing cache does not seem to solve it. Switching browsers does not seem to solve it, either. I can send screenshots of two browsers on one machine, both hitting the same editor page and getting the same error, even after flushing cache. The screenshots are coming from sites now using ssl as a default transport layer. I am working at getting screenshots of the same error on another site that is using ssl and experiencing the same issues.
My apologies. I will not bump anything anymore. Sometimes it is hard to tell when you see lots of other tickets processed and the one you submitted is a couple days out. I just did not want to have it drop through the cracks.
As far as custom coding, I sure wish there was a basic how-to on some of the more advanced items like building modules. I say this because it would start a whole new level of customization that will show even more capabilities for Enfold. In the past, we have contacted several organizations for customization of Enfold, but every single time they come back extremely expensive, far, far, far more than other theme customization. Before the sort order was added as a choice in the modal windows, one developer wanted over $5,000. I found out through searching that it was a matter of a few basic tweaks and it worked like a charm. That is why many of us stopped going to custom developers like Werkpress and others.
There are many of us that would love to build-upon Enfold and would even share what we build with others. I just wish there was a conduit for that. We have lots of licenses and it would help us help you sell lots more. You have a motivated audience that reveres what you built and are wanting to take it even further. The blanket statement of go find a developer generally ends up with no one doing anything, except living with how it exists. Instead, you could have a whole new mid-level development audience that is furthering in areas that go unfilled now.
Here you go. Really simple. I just want the sum of the icon buttons centered. If I could only wrap them in a div, I could easily handle it in css, but I just cannot find a way to grab hold of them, since the centered alignment option does not seem to work.
Hey, quick follow-up question…
I really wanted the whole line of icons centered, but when selecting center justification, it wants to put them all on separate rows. Am I missing something simple?
This is great. Thank you!
Instead of adding it to the Quick CSS, I added it to the child theme’s css file. This way it is safe from future edits.
Thank you again for the help.
I forgot to add, this is a WP 4.5.1 install with the latest Enfold 3.5.4, running with a child theme. The child theme has a function added allowing elements to have css classes. Otherwise, it is a stock install.
I agree. For those not wanting to use Google fonts, it inserts extra code and overhead that is not needed. Plus, it also portrays the effect of there being no other choices than Google Fonts, when there are many. In my opinion, if Enfold is to support custom fonts, it needs to do so in a way that is agnostic, or else leave it to plug-ins completely. Just my opinion, but the same issues keep coming up year after year and we need a better solution than just hacking things to make them work.
I just defined the fonts manually in the child theme css file, but this can be done in the quick css area as well.
This is what I used in this one case, but your’s will vary, based upon the typeface you are using.
body {
font-family: “colosseum”,sans-serif !important;
font-style: normal !important;
font-weight: 300 !important;
}h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 {
font-family: “colosseum” !important,sans-serif;
font-style: normal !important;
font-weight: 500 !important;
}It is really frustrating to have to do these things in functions when they used to be easier in the settings. Why can’t we just have options to disable it, period? The code above did not work until I hard coded the css with important tags.
Has there been any movement on having the ability to filter by tags (either visually or through shortcode)?
Every one of the example pages that were listed under pages that should work is exhibiting the redirect to the home page issue. I just re-verified each of them. I will get login details shortly.
I respectfully, but wholeheartedly disagree. There is no way to tell what conflicts people (purchasers of Enfold) are seeing, nor how people are working around them.
Case in point. How about 4.1.1? 4.1 took a bit and there was confusion on compatibility. Is it really that hard to have a single place in the forum that talks about compatibility? We’re not asking you to create a compatibility chart for every single version of WP and Enfold going back to 1. We are just asking for a current version or two compatibility. Just saying a version gives NO discovery, no insight, no reproducibility, nothing, just a version number.
With the assault on WP from a security standpoint, we need as much information as possible. When WP comes out with a new version, people should not have to scour the forums to know what works and what does not. There are a lot of us with tons of installs we are managing that would be happy to provide quick feedback, but would also relish in the fact of a single place to know what to expect.
We are the people in the trenches out here, selling and supporting your themes. We’re asking for a little tool to help us help you. If it were a huge ordeal, I would not have asked. But this is a simple sticky post that pertains to one subject – compatibility.
