well if you activate the alb for events it might be easy – or do i missunderstood your request?

https://kriesi.at/support/topic/the-events-calendar/#post-366328

If you want to use footer with widgets as well than it is more difficult to fixe it, because you have to be aware of seeing all content in main.
If footer is allow to scroll there is no problem with that solution above

this is the html background-color : try this

html.responsive, .responsive body {
    background-color: #fff !important
}

try this one – but it might not work on the most mobile Phones:

#socket {
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
z-index: 999;
}

its hard to decide what to do from a screenshot.
If you don’t like to make your site-url public than put it in a private message.

oh i see the url on screenshot :
so – i don’t know where this settings come from but if you put in quick css :

.html_header_top.html_header_sticky #top #wrap_all #main {
    padding-top: 43px !important;
}

this could help.

More or less i think this is a feature and not a bug :lol:
sometimes i like to give the other languages different colors or a different logo. So this is nice to have that it is an extra setup for each language.
But i think you are right that a checkbox for always duplicate settings or not will be a nice feature for those who only want to have different content.

btw. i don’t know if an “export theme settingsfile” on enfold options dialog import/export will work.
You can try to export the settings on e.g. english and change than to the different language and import the settingsfile than.

well the body has in this case the class : home
so you can use

@media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 989px) {
.home #header_main .container { padding: 5px 0px}
.home #wrap_all {padding: 0px 30px}
}

btw: on padding and margin you can shorten the code
if there are two values than it is (up – down) (left-right)
so padding : 5px 0 means the same as : 5px 0 5px 0
if there are tree values it is meant: up (left/right) down

• This reply was modified 9 years, 7 months ago by Guenni007.

thats a pity and long time ago i made a featured request to put in the installable package the version.txt here – but it seem to be an envato thing.

i think the orignal set of that is in:

.av-main-nav > li > a {
    display: block;
    font-size: 13px;
    font-weight: 600;
    padding: 0 13px;
    text-decoration: none;
    transition: background-color 0.4s ease-in-out 0s, color 0.4s ease-in-out 0s;
}

so if you goto quick css and change padding i guess this is what you want:

.av-main-nav > li > a {
    padding: 0 30px;
}

Es wäre so schön, dass am Objekt der Begierde gleich zu testen!
Ein Link dahin – und wenn du es nicht öffentlich machen willst markiere die Nachricht als Privat, macht es viel leichter zu helfen.

oh sorry i see this is not the layerslider it is the fullwidth slider on that demo – it has the option to set two link buttons implemented.

On Caption of the fullwidth slider there is the option: “Apply a link or buttons to the slide?”
there you can set “attach two buttons”

http://webers-testseite.de/enf01/?page_id=41

and btw. why don’t you link the site you mentioned?

http://kriesi.at/themes/enfold/homepage/home-v9-videos-and-parallax/

• This reply was modified 9 years, 7 months ago by Guenni007.

Well what image processing program do you have?
here you can see your pictures with 200kb and i think there is a marginal quality loss
http://webers-testseite.de/enf02/fullwidth-slider/

the image dimensions are one aspect of file size. The other is the compression level. Very often it is better to take a big compression at big images than to take a small picture with less compression.

have a look here: http://kriesi.at/archives/4-key-wordpress-image-optimization-tips

A huge JPEG (inches, not kilobytes) saved at a high compression rate can look better than a smaller image at reduced compression when re-sized for your page.

this is a nice freeware tool if you work behind MacOSX : https://imageoptim.com/

@shannab – you have images above 2MB Dataamount ! one is 3.5MB
recalculate those images . Take jpg and progressive option for them.
Do not take the highest quality option – high or middle is enough ! I guess that 2000 px width will be enough !
espacially because some are not so sharp (a bit blured even)

this will help loading time

edit : oh Elliot mentioned it allready – so try to shrink your images without alterning the dimensions

• This reply was modified 9 years, 8 months ago by Guenni007.