Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 8, 2020 at 6:51 pm in reply to: Full width AND bottom aligned Read more button in Post Slider #1236247
nice – it is because standard setting on display: flex is : align-items: stretch !
background-color : none /*** is not a valid value ***/i’m participant as you are – so you had to wait til mods are here – i can not see private content.
it could not be the browser cache – because i see the header fixed too.
And any other cache? we had to find then that rule concerning to a fixed header – but even with the css set the header to postion absolute – it has to scroll away..html_header_top.html_header_transparency #header { position: absolute; }and there is the correct class on html: html_header_sticky_disabled
( with a sticky header there should be : html_header_sticky )so this is strange!
given up already?
see my comment that you only have to exclude from the divs the submenu. thats all insert that code – it is corrected allready – just copy & paste from here: https://kriesi.at/support/topic/fixed-background-color-section-doesnt-work/#post-1235469
all grid-rows that you like to have as no full-width elements give that custom-class to them: grid-notfull
as participant i do not see your private content – but lightbox has in its markup a mfp-bg ( background) and the mfp-wrap for the content – i guess what you look for is the mfp-bg opacity which is on default at 0.8
this is standard definition:.mfp-bg { top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; z-index: 1042; overflow: hidden; position: fixed; background: #000; opacity: 0.8; }but sometimes ( depends on the source you open it must have a more specific selector like:
.mfp-zoom-in.mfp-ready.mfp-bg, .mfp-zoom-in.mfp-ready .mfp-preloader { opacity: 0.8; }August 6, 2020 at 5:49 pm in reply to: Solution: Contact Form 7 reCaptcha and Enfold privacy settings #1235811Nice – thanks for the code.
I prefer my borlabs cookie – but this is a good addition for enfold usage.August 6, 2020 at 5:18 pm in reply to: Full width AND bottom aligned Read more button in Post Slider #1235803by the way : this is with collecting all articles in one container that we can style it with flexmodell:
function wrap_read_more_link(){ if(is_page(37595)){ ?> <script type="text/javascript"> (function($) { $(window).load(function(){ $('.read-more-link').each(function() { $(this).parent().parent().append($(this)); }); $('.slide-entry').each( function() { $(this).find('.slide-content .entry-content-header').append($(this).find('.entry-footer')); $(this).find('.more-link' ).wrapInner('<span class="weiter"></span>'); }); $('.avia-content-slider-inner .slide-entry-wrap .slide-entry').each( function() { $(this).detach().appendTo('.avia-content-slider-inner .slide-entry-wrap:first'); }); $('.avia-content-slider-inner .slide-entry-wrap:empty').remove(); }); })(jQuery); </script> <?php } } add_action('wp_footer', 'wrap_read_more_link');this is only for my testpage – pagespecific.
But to reconfigure the DOM in this way it is not nice – it works but it takes timeResults see : https://webers-testseite.de/blog-posts-in-list-view/
<a href="link to your image" ><i class="fa fa-eye" aria-hidden="true"></i></a>I removed it from my page now – because i do not need font-awesome.
it remains visible in the frontend, but in the backend the code is unfortunately no longer visible after saving.
Maybe it is also due to my implementation via:( just embedded via functions.php the fast way by:
function font_awesome_5(){ ?> <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://use.fontawesome.com/releases/v5.8.1/css/all.css" integrity="sha384-50oBUHEmvpQ+1lW4y57PTFmhCaXp0ML5d60M1M7uH2+nqUivzIebhndOJK28anvf" crossorigin="anonymous"> <?php } add_action('wp_head', 'font_awesome_5');August 6, 2020 at 2:48 pm in reply to: Solution: Contact Form 7 reCaptcha and Enfold privacy settings #1235749is there anything to adjust in your code – that it works?
Where did you enter the api key on cf7 integration – or on Enfold Options?Thanks
so again my question : how did you insert that icon
Custom ID : you did read this carefully: “Use with caution, be sure to have a unique value on the page and also make sure to only use allowed characters (latin characters, underscores, dashes and numbers, no special characters can be used).”
Edit: i can confirm that only on normal ( not pricing tables the ID is missing)
______________
Edit ( no on my side your html code works – and there is not custom ID in it )
so this is not the reason for your problem:
i think that you are using the dollar symbol that is a code symbol too like greater than or less than.
There is a little plugin written by Günter to have these special characters in the content without breaking the layout: avia-special-characterslittle description: https://kriesi.at/support/topic/problem-with-hyphens/#post-1179376
-
This reply was modified 5 years, 5 months ago by
Guenni007.
i thought you like to have it full-width on that page ?
then you had to remove the max-width ( or set to 100%)
and maybe set an margin: 0 auto – and a padding : 0 50pxsomething like this:
.ajde_evcal_calendar { width: 100%; text-align: left; white-space: normal; position: relative; color: #808080; padding-bottom: 10px; max-width: 100%; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 50px; }can you show me a link to that page with the icon?
how did you insert the icon ( guess it is font-awesome) – as shortcode ?
or this way ?
<i class="fa fa-eye" aria-hidden="true"></i>you can surround this with an
<a href …></a>
see here your eye: https://webers-testseite.de/abc/by the way – entypo-fontello got the eye too in the list – that is more comfortable to style.
as i understand him he wants to have a bigger logo displayed – and not one that is downscaled to 300px – not even the original image
if you like to have that – and you do not want to let the logo overlap the header container – you only have the chance to rise up the header height.
because this is responsible for the max-height value of the logo inside.August 6, 2020 at 12:05 pm in reply to: Styling for Masonry Title when brining in portfolio items #1235664these selectors are correct – but even if you set the rules to !important – there might be another rule concerning to these elements with a higher specifity.
You can see here a specifity calculator that gives you a feeling which selector wins the run! ;) Link
ID’s got a higher weight on specifity than classes than pseudo-classes – so maybe you try:#top .av-masonry-entry-title.entry-title { font-size: 10px !important; color: #fff !important; } #top .figcaption.av-inner-masonry-content { padding: 30px !important; }better advice only possible if i can see the real site
there must be a css rule that is:
.ajde_evcal_calendar { width: 100%; text-align: left; white-space: normal; position: relative; color: #808080; padding-bottom: 10px; max-width: 1310px; margin: auto; }you see the max-width : 1310px
and that is the way i see it : reduced to that widthBest would be to see the site it concerns. because i do not know how you placed the image in the footer.
Is it an image widget or a text with implemented image ?And to what direction the search-input field should open?
Where does the ajax search results should toggle?
What happend to the scroll to top button?This in child-theme functions.php will place the magnifier icon in the menu3 of enfold:
function avia_append_search_nav3 ( $items, $args ) { if ((is_object($args) && $args->theme_location == 'avia3') || (is_string($args) && $args = "fallback_menu")) { global $avia_config; ob_start(); get_search_form(); $form = htmlspecialchars(ob_get_clean()) ; $items .= '<li id="menu-item-search3" class="noMobile menu-item menu-item-search-dropdown menu-item-avia-special"> <a href="?s=" data-avia-search-tooltip="'.$form.'" '.av_icon_string('search').'> <span class="avia_hidden_link_text">'.__('Search','avia_framework').'</span> </a> </li>'; } return $items; } add_filter( 'wp_nav_menu_items', 'avia_append_search_nav3', 10, 2 );but i do not know how to get the ajax search results to show
colorize the sort button too:
.category-allgemein .av-masonry-entry-title, .allgemein_sort_button span { color: red; } .category-grafik .av-masonry-entry-title, .grafik_sort_button span { color: green; }https://webers-testseite.de/gallery/
.category-allgemein .av-masonry-entry-title { color: red; } .category-grafik .av-masonry-entry-title { color: green; }any link to see what is the matter?
On the anchor of the masonry-item there are classes – f.e. if you show portfolios there is a class f.e. portfolio_entries-webdesign
the webdesign is the portfolio “category”
So if you define for each category like this:
syntax is: portfolio_entries-xyz.portfolio_entries-webdesign .av-masonry-entry-title { color: red; }there must be a similar solution for blog posts and categories something like: category-allgemein
syntax here is: category-xyzwait – there is a sub-menu – ok i look …
yes : change in the css code above ( inside the mediaquery – not as an addition – a substitue) :
#main > div:not(.av-submenu-container) { z-index: 3; position: relative !important; }so that there is only: https://kriesi.at/support/topic/fixed-background-color-section-doesnt-work/#post-1235469
The not rule excludes the submenu container from that.
August 5, 2020 at 5:15 pm in reply to: Full width AND bottom aligned Read more button in Post Slider #1235472if you like to have those containers in equal height – the flexbox modell is helpfull here.
Unfortunately the articles are grouped according to the settings in 3, 4 etc columns. Without this grouping it would be even better with the flex-box model.
I’ll see if I can collect all articles and put them into one slide-entry-wrap.only this:
corrected code including the fix for the submenu@media only screen and (min-width: 768px){ #wrap_all { padding-bottom: 400px; } #main > div:not(.av-submenu-container) { z-index: 3; position: relative !important; } #main #vidde { position: fixed !important; bottom: 0; z-index: 0 !important; height: 400px; width: 100%; } }just remove all you inserterd and copy again that corrected code here: https://kriesi.at/support/topic/fixed-background-color-section-doesnt-work/#post-1235431
remove the rule outside that media query: ( only the code above)
#main > div { z-index: 3; position: relative !important; }there is two ID’s on that rule:
#main #vidde { position: fixed !important; bottom: 0; z-index: 0 !important; height: 400px; width: 100%; }The reason is: #main > div is a rule with one ID and an additonal element
so it is more specific than a rule with only one ID – because #vidde is a #main > div ( it is a div that follows directly the #main container) – the postion : fixed could not overwrite the #main > div rule.
If an element fullfills more than one selector – the more specific will win that run !See here f.e. a specifity calculator: https://specificity.keegan.st/

-
This reply was modified 5 years, 5 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts

