Hi @Ismael and @guenter,

Thanks for your answer! Just to make it clear, you have already introduced a bug that breaks existing layouts. I’m not in any means saying you should change what thumbnail is being used. My fix is a quick and dirty solution to fix a urgent problem for me and some others that have updated to a newer version of Enfold and then got this problem. But I don’t want to change what thumbnail is being used as a permanent fix.

Have you looked into why this problem occurs. Why the 450×450 px image is being favoured over the settings Enfold provides regarding cropping/ratio of product catalogue images? No settings have been changed after updating and all of a sudden 450×450 px is being displayed even though the setting is set to display uncropped images if a 450×450 px is generated for the product.

If you will not do anything more about this, then is there a way for me to see what changes have been made in the last three (or so) versions of Enfold? Can I get access to other versions than the latest?

Best regards,
Martin

Hi Rikard,

Just one more question: is there a way to know what image sizes are in use and which are not?
In Settings / Media I currently have 22 different image sizes and under Thumbnail regeneration there’s 26 items with different dimensions.
I’m quite sure we are not using them all.

I understand if i apply this code I will be deleting them all, right?

function remove_enfold_image_sizes() {
// do NOT remove widget size, is used in backend portfolio items!
// remove_image_size(‘widget’);
remove_image_size(‘square’);
remove_image_size(‘featured’);
remove_image_size(‘featured_large’);
remove_image_size(‘portfolio’);
remove_image_size(‘portfolio_small’);
remove_image_size(‘gallery’);
remove_image_size(‘magazine’);
remove_image_size(‘masonry’);
remove_image_size(‘entry_without_sidebar’);
remove_image_size(‘entry_with_sidebar’);
remove_image_size(‘shop_thumbnail’);
remove_image_size(‘shop_catalog’);
remove_image_size(‘shop_single’);
remove_image_size(‘shop_gallery_thumbnail’);
}
add_action(‘init’, ‘remove_enfold_image_sizes’);

how can I know which ones are not being used and which are?

Thanks!!

Nasi

Hello Ismael

Thanks heaps for pointing me in the direction of the fix for the WooCommerce Thumbnails. That worked.

Now for Issue 2. on the price not displaying on variations, I think it might be a similar problem. I tested deactivating the Super Variation Swatch Plugin but that did not change anything… BUT what I noticed is similar to the Thumbnail Cropping Issue it is something that only happens on newly uploaded products… If you have a look here

This is an old product (Super Variation Swatch Plugin turned off)

pricing is showing perfectly

Here is a newly uploaded product (Super Variation Swatch Plugin turned off)

pricing not showing, even though it is defined in the variations in the backend?

I tested this on the Development Server, which you can access via credentials listed on the initial post but also below.

Thanks heaps.
Corina

Hi,

Yes Corina, it sounds just like the same issue I’m having. Have seen others also reporting it today.

Ismael or someone else at Enfold, I tried to understand why the problem is not consistent but why we get mixed cropped and uncropped images. It looks to me like the cropped version is displayed if a 450×450 version of the image has been generated, otherwise the image is displayed uncropped.

I wrote a short snippet of code that works for me:

add_filter( 'avf_wc_before_shop_loop_item_title_img_size', 'temp_thumbnail_size_fix', 10, 1 );

function temp_thumbnail_size_fix( $thumbnail_size ) {
    return 'woocommerce_thumbnail';
}

But there is apparently a bug in Enfold when it comes to using the settings from Appearance > Customize > WooCommerce > Product Images so please let a developer have a look at this.

Hi Ismael,

No, not 174×245 px. The woocommerce_thumbnail has been set to 173 and i tried changing that to 174 and then uploading one of the product images that is currently displaying incorrectly. A 174×238 image was generated but then it still displays the product thumbnail using 450×450.

The uncropped registered image sizes are currently (after changing 173 to 174 in the Appearance > Customize > WooCommerce > Product):

• medium – 300 x 300
• medium_large – 768 x 9999
• large – 1030 x 1030
• product-image-mini – 50 x 0
• 1536×1536 – 1536 x 1536
• 2048×2048 – 2048 x 2048
• extra_large – 1500 x 1500
• masonry – 705 x 705
• shop_single – 450 x 999
• shop-hi-res – 320 x 470
• double-full-width – 2420 x 0
• woocommerce_thumbnail – 174 x 0
• woocommerce_single – 450 x 0

And all the generated images with the current setting are (including cropped images):

• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-100×100.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-1096×1500.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-1123×423.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-1123×430.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-1123×630.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-120×120.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-174×238.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-180×180.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-219×300.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-260×185.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-301×301.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-320×438.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-36×36.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-450×450.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-450×616.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-495×400.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-500×225.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-50×68.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-515×705.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-710×375.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-753×1030.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-80×80.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-845×321.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized-845×684.jpeg
• omslag-suburbanweekend-resized.jpeg

Sorry, we do not have a staging site but I have a local installation and can do tests if you want to.

Best regards
Martin

Hi Ismael,
I wrote “…in the Woocommerce customizer the width value is 300px…” whay you ask me that? There is 300px width and the Thumbnails are 450×450 actually. it doesn’t seem like Enfold cares about this setting?!

Best regards
Mike

I would like to have the option of NOT displaying the featured image like what’s shown on the link that you sent me.

While the images in your sample don’t look bad at all, mine tend to look pixelated which is most likely due to the fact that they’re not large enough in their original state to be stretched out like that and not start to look jenky.

But is there way to have a featured image, so I’ve got a thumbnail in the footer etc, yet not have it displayed like on the site that you sent me?

Rikard! You, sir, are in a position to make my day! If we can figure this out within the next few hours before my meeting with my boss, we will be winners among those who merely show up!

Here’s what I’ve got:

First image (http://brucegust.com/downloads/full_page.png): This is the way my page looks like when you click on a “category” and it displays all of the posts that belong to that particular family of articles. In this example, the “featured image” is the trophy. In its proper context, the trophy shows up just fine within the article itself. But when it’s displayed as part of a whole category of similar posts, that same image is now enlarged and pixelated.

That’s what I’m trying to avoid! How can I fix that?

Second image (http://brucegust.com/downloads/sidebar.png): Ultimately, this is why I appreciate the “featured image” dynamic as much as I do. I like being able to include a small thumbnail alongside each article the way they’re displayed either in the footer or, in this instance, the sidebar.

This is part of what prompts my question. I want that part of the “featured image” mechanism. I just don’t want the enlarged and nasty looking image displayed like what I have pictured on http://brucegust.com/downloads/full_page.png.

Bonus (http://brucegust.com/downloads/this_space.png): Rikard, I realize this borders on being a completely different question and I will open up another thread if you prefer I do it that way. But this is all related in that the featured images that I want to see displayed on the side bar would ideally be accompanied by a larger image beneath them. I was envisioning a clickable photo that might connect a user to another article. Is that possible?

Thanks for your time!