Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@Yigit, thanks for the update, helps us plan when we get clearer information like that.
Can you confirm, will responsive images for all image elements finally be included in this release? I really hope so.
Thanks for all your work, hope to see a roadmap for Enfold for 2020.
Hey @ismael,
Thanks for getting back to me.
So, I have your snipped from an early reply in my child theme functions file, all my products have prices, and I tried enabling reviews to see if that did the trick. Still not quite right.
It does generate some product data (and same if reviews are turned off) but not a complete Product listing for Goole to recognise its actually a product.
Hi,
Has the dev team responded yet?
I do have Yoast SEO installed, but as in my original posts private details, so does the other site. Both of my sites have the same plugins that would touch Schema. The only difference between the two is one site uses standard WooCommerce product pages, the other one uses custom product pages built with the ALB.
Hi Ismael,
I’m sorry, I don’t really understand your response properly.
My basic question is: Is there a fix for this coming?
Adding your snippet still does not allow Google to see the page as a legitimate product.
Thanks
Tim
Hey Ismael,
Thank you, I have tried the code and it works (kind of). In the structured data testing tool is isn’t displayed as a Product, although it does contain the product information. And the description section contains all sorts of duplicate and unnecessary information.
I understand what you are saying about having the required information. But I don’t understand the logic behind how it currently works. Let me explain:
If I am selling a product, then surely I want all the product related schema along with it. However, I might like to customise the look of the product – thus why we would use the ALB to build the product page. Using the ALB doesn’t mean I want parts of the product schema missing, just because I won’t be displaying them on the front end. That is just a design choice, not a technical choice.
It would be a lot more logical to me to grab all the related product data and output it regardless of if it will be shown on the front end or not. But perhaps to keep everyone happy, this could simply be an option in the Theme settings or on each product page – “Include all schema markup even if not displayed on front end? Yes/No” type thing.
I hope that makes sense.
Can I ask, is the code you posted to me above the fix for this, or are your devs looking into this some more for better implementation?
Thanks a lot
They really need to add a WooCommerce Product Image element in the ALB as currently, I think you need to create a standard image or gallery for what you want.
I’ve had the same issue and always wondered why the option to place the product image wasn’t easily available in the builder.
Please bear in mind, its not just on my site as you mentioned – your own demo site doesn’t have it either.
Something must have changed theme-wise.
(By the way, REALLY loving your stick of up-coming Enfold changes – thank you very much for listening to our feedback on the need for something like that, I hope it continually gets updated)
Hi Ismael,
Thanks for the reply and getting the dev team onto it.
I tried your snippet and cleared caches, but it still doesn’t appear to be working.
The snippet is still in there if you want to test it.
Hi Gunter,
That is brilliant, thank you VERY much for following this up quickly and thoroughly. I don’t have time to beta test at the moment unfortunately but as soon as you release it as a stable update I will update and test it out.
And as for the roadmap, again a big thank you for doing something about it. I took a look at the new sticky, and it is great to see. I think it may result in fewer support requests for you as well, as for instance I see in the new sticky another issue that I had noticed is already being addressed.
Thanks again
Tim
Also Gunter, I know I’ve asked this many times (and many others have too), but is it possible to get a roadmap of Enfold updates coming up? It would really help as developers to know what to expect, when to plan for update cycles, what bugs we know you are prioritising etc.
Hey Gunter,
Excellent, thanks for following this up, I hope it can be somewhat of a priority. Also just to reiterate, please do check all parts of the theme, as the ones I mentioned were just examples, but I’m sure every element thanks links out probably has the same issue.
Cheers
Tim
Hey guys,
Any roadmap for these fixes?
One of your mods said….
“I’m currently working on a solution for Enfold to handle scrset and size attribute for images. As this will affect many parts and ALB elements of Enfold a first step (hopefully in the next release) will provide a basic implementation for manageing this and then we will implement it step by step for the images. ”
So now that 4.6 is out, is there any improvements in it on this? COuldn’t see any in changelog
Also, completely off topic, is the new 4.6 version compatible with WooCommerce 3.7? I saw no mention of it in the changelog.
Cheers
Tim
Hi Ismael,
I think there might be some confusion between responsive images and retina images.
As I understand it, responsive images are a great start, but still are not Retina (or HiDPI) ready necessarily. These need to be appended with “@2x” at the end of the file name.
Please see here: https://meowapps.com/plugin/wp-retina-2x/ for more info.
But basically once you enable srcset on your Enfold image elements, then this plugin should take care of the rest.
I’m really keen to see your implementation of this.
Thanks again.
Hi @Gunter, Thank you for the reply.
It’s great to hear that you are working on a far reaching improvement to this, thank you very much for the update. I really look forward to seeing huge progress on this soon(ish).
Could I suggest you also test compatibility with the hugely popular WP Retina 2x plugin as you implement things?
Would love to see a roadmap of upcoming changes in general, it really helps to keep confidence in using Enfold for our client jobs high.
Regards
Tim
Hey guys,
Thanks for your reply.
I contacted the author and here is his reply:
Could this be incorporated into a future Enfold update, to ensure responsive, retina images are served? Your theme does claim to be Retina-Ready, which in most respects it is. But you would expect the image element to be as well.
Would love to hear your thoughts.
Thanks.
Also, it seems you enabled the socket menu…I’m disabling it again as I don’t want it live.
Any other changes you made that I should be aware of? Did you do an image regen or something? Something has created 10GB of temp files seemingly related to imagik overnight.
Thanks
Hi Victoria,
To clarify, do you mean the caching/minification settings in Enfold itself, or also the LightSpeed caching plugin I’m running?
Thanks
Same thing here, switching to “Always load all elements” fixed it, seems there is a bug in the code that gets removed on the other “Load only used elements” option, which is a shame as that is a great feature.
I had this problem too, drove me crazy. Really surprised there isn’t a simple Enfold setting for a modern, full width blog.
I got it to work by turning off sidebars, and then adding this code to the custom css:
@media all { #top .fullsize .template-blog .post-title { text-align: center; font-size: 30px; padding: 15px 0; max-width: 100%; margin: 0 auto; } @media all { #top .fullsize .template-blog .post .entry-content-wrapper { text-align: justify; font-size: 1.15em; line-height: 1.7em; max-width: 100%; margin: 0 auto; overflow: visible; } } @media all { #top .fullsize .template-blog .post .entry-content-wrapper > * { max-width: 100%; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; } }You can see it in use here: https://www.microstockman.com/adobe-stock-interview-2018/
Hey again,
Thanks for forwarding that to the devs but it seems you have only commented on one part of my message.
My prime concern are the errors being reported by the image schema markup Enfold has included. Can you pleas advise on correcting these issues as mentioned in the links above??
Thanks
