Tagged: LayerSlider, slider, slow
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 13, 2015 at 7:31 pm #443965
Hi,
I’m using the Layerslider WP full width with 2 sliders using jpeg’s that are only approx 96kb.
When I view the site on the latest browser from Firefox and Chrome it takes up to 45 seconds for the first slider to load.
I have used Enfold for over 20 websites and I have never seen this before.May 14, 2015 at 10:34 am #444195Hey Snerp!
It loaded the slider within 2-3 seconds on my end, maybe it was only something temporary?
Regards,
RikardJune 30, 2015 at 4:00 pm #466549Hello,
I am having the same problem with this website, and am ready to scrap the slider unless you can help me with this. Please check the load time here: http://rusticbest.comActually, also with the masonry gallery here: http://rusticbest.com/store-tour/
Both places take forever to load.- This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by shannab.
July 1, 2015 at 3:46 pm #467044Hey!
The images your using are totaling to around 4+ megabytes which is way too big for use on the web. You will need to optimize those by cropping / scaling them to a smaller size.
To further optimize your site I recommend installing a caching plugin such as W3 total cache or WP Supercache. A plugin such as BWP Minify would help with minifying the JS and CSS.
Best regards,
Elliott- This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by Elliott.
July 1, 2015 at 4:09 pm #467067Images are ok but you havn’t activated gzip compression on your hoster.
It depends on the server from hoster side how you can achieve this – but this will save a lot of server response time!i think you are sitting behind an apache server so try it with htaccess activation
76.1% bandwidth could be saved
some of those caching plugins mentioned above will do that too – and sometimes this is the biggest effect of them :lol:
- This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by Guenni007.
July 1, 2015 at 4:15 pm #467079@shannab – you have images above 2MB Dataamount ! one is 3.5MB
recalculate those images . Take jpg and progressive option for them.
Do not take the highest quality option – high or middle is enough ! I guess that 2000 px width will be enough !
espacially because some are not so sharp (a bit blured even)this will help loading time
edit : oh Elliot mentioned it allready – so try to shrink your images without alterning the dimensions
- This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by Guenni007.
July 1, 2015 at 4:47 pm #467101here is an example for a fullscreen slider
you only see a difference at high contrasts (rider with lance – jpg artefact) but even the 320kb image is good enough for a fast slide.July 1, 2015 at 8:52 pm #467236Thanks, I feel silly now. Reducing and cropping the slider images should have been a no brainer, just did it and they pop right up.
As for the additional plug-ins I’ll check into it, too.
Thanks for the quick help.
Shanna
July 1, 2015 at 11:30 pm #467274Well what image processing program do you have?
here you can see your pictures with 200kb and i think there is a marginal quality loss
http://webers-testseite.de/enf02/fullwidth-slider/the image dimensions are one aspect of file size. The other is the compression level. Very often it is better to take a big compression at big images than to take a small picture with less compression.
have a look here: http://kriesi.at/archives/4-key-wordpress-image-optimization-tips
A huge JPEG (inches, not kilobytes) saved at a high compression rate can look better than a smaller image at reduced compression when re-sized for your page.
this is a nice freeware tool if you work behind MacOSX : https://imageoptim.com/
July 3, 2015 at 2:19 pm #467993@Guenni007
Thank you as always!
@shannab
Let us know in a new ticket if you have some more questions or need assistance.Cheers!
Andy -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.