Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #443965

    Hi,

    I’m using the Layerslider WP full width with 2 sliders using jpeg’s that are only approx 96kb.
    When I view the site on the latest browser from Firefox and Chrome it takes up to 45 seconds for the first slider to load.
    I have used Enfold for over 20 websites and I have never seen this before.

    http://businesslawgroup.ca/

    #444195

    Hey Snerp!

    It loaded the slider within 2-3 seconds on my end, maybe it was only something temporary?

    Regards,
    Rikard

    #466549

    Hello,
    I am having the same problem with this website, and am ready to scrap the slider unless you can help me with this. Please check the load time here: http://rusticbest.com

    Actually, also with the masonry gallery here: http://rusticbest.com/store-tour/
    Both places take forever to load.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 9 months ago by shannab.
    #467044

    Hey!

    The images your using are totaling to around 4+ megabytes which is way too big for use on the web. You will need to optimize those by cropping / scaling them to a smaller size.

    To further optimize your site I recommend installing a caching plugin such as W3 total cache or WP Supercache. A plugin such as BWP Minify would help with minifying the JS and CSS.

    Best regards,
    Elliott

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 9 months ago by Elliott.
    #467067

    Images are ok but you havn’t activated gzip compression on your hoster.
    It depends on the server from hoster side how you can achieve this – but this will save a lot of server response time!

    i think you are sitting behind an apache server so try it with htaccess activation

    76.1% bandwidth could be saved

    some of those caching plugins mentioned above will do that too – and sometimes this is the biggest effect of them :lol:

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 9 months ago by Guenni007.
    #467079

    @shannab – you have images above 2MB Dataamount ! one is 3.5MB
    recalculate those images . Take jpg and progressive option for them.
    Do not take the highest quality option – high or middle is enough ! I guess that 2000 px width will be enough !
    espacially because some are not so sharp (a bit blured even)

    this will help loading time

    edit : oh Elliot mentioned it allready – so try to shrink your images without alterning the dimensions

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 9 months ago by Guenni007.
    #467101

    here is an example for a fullscreen slider
    you only see a difference at high contrasts (rider with lance – jpg artefact) but even the 320kb image is good enough for a fast slide.

    http://webers-testseite.de/enf02/vollbildslider/

    #467236

    Thanks, I feel silly now. Reducing and cropping the slider images should have been a no brainer, just did it and they pop right up.

    As for the additional plug-ins I’ll check into it, too.

    Thanks for the quick help.

    Shanna

    #467274

    Well what image processing program do you have?
    here you can see your pictures with 200kb and i think there is a marginal quality loss
    http://webers-testseite.de/enf02/fullwidth-slider/

    the image dimensions are one aspect of file size. The other is the compression level. Very often it is better to take a big compression at big images than to take a small picture with less compression.

    have a look here: http://kriesi.at/archives/4-key-wordpress-image-optimization-tips

    A huge JPEG (inches, not kilobytes) saved at a high compression rate can look better than a smaller image at reduced compression when re-sized for your page.

    this is a nice freeware tool if you work behind MacOSX : https://imageoptim.com/

    #467993

    @Guenni007
    Thank you as always!


    @shannab

    Let us know in a new ticket if you have some more questions or need assistance.

    Cheers!
    Andy

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.