Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 25, 2024 at 2:17 pm #1469838
    strumpumpel

    Dear support,
    i tested my site performance with pingdom and lighthouse browser developer tools in chrome.
    Yes in a new inkognito window.
    My result for mobile test (in lighthouse) is terrible!
    Reduce JavaScript execution time to 11.2 s
    URL CPU-Zeit insgesamt Skriptauswertung Parsen von Skripten
    mysite.de (Eigene) 9.454 ms 8.087 ms 45 ms

    Minimize effort for main thread 13.4 s

    Can you please make a test with a chrome inkognito window and lighthouse?

    Regards and thanks strumpel.

    October 28, 2024 at 4:58 am #1469964
    Ismael

    Hey strumpumpel,

    Thank you for the inquiry.

    Reduce JavaScript execution time to 11.2 s

    This can typically be improved by installing a cache and compression plugin. Have you done any speed optimization on the site? If not, please refer to the articles below. However, keep in mind that achieving optimal results may require some experimentation due to the various combinations of options, plugins, and other scripts.

    // https://kriesi.at/archives/scoring-100-100-in-google-pagespeed-insights-gtmetrix-pagespeed-and-yslow
    // https://gtmetrix.com/wordpress-optimization-guide.html

    Best regards,
    Ismael

    October 28, 2024 at 5:13 pm #1470027
    strumpumpel

    Dear Ismael,
    in my site run wp-rocket …. this plugin is the best on market …

    But but still I have this 11.2 seconds of javascript execution time.

    You don’t have no other idea, way, solution?

    Could you please look at my website for a few minutes?

    Please …

    Regards strumpel

    October 29, 2024 at 4:07 am #1470059
    Ismael

    Hi,

    Thank you for the update.

    in my site run wp-rocket …. this plugin is the best on market …

    What’s “best in the market” may not be what’s best for your site. As mentioned above, this might require some experimentation due to the number of plugins or scripts added. Did you follow the instructions in the articles we posted above? We checked the site and found that the images are not compressed or could benefit from optimization, such as using smaller dimensions.

    Best regards,
    Ismael

    December 13, 2024 at 11:01 pm #1473602
    Guenni007

    @strumpumpel:

    Guenni007 so great for your fast help!
    Arrr … i don’t usede the code tag …. :(
    Sorry total!
    Bist Du Deutscher?

    Ja – der andere Beitrag ist schon zu.

    btw. if you use on your landing page the advanced layer slider element – it is hard to get good loadiing times.
    not least because the slider needs to be time-controlled to load the content. That’s the point behind it. So if you see my test page, the slider is set to show the entire content after approx. 7 seconds.

    if you got an advanced layerslider on your landing page – then it might be usefull to play a bit with the advanced layerslider performance settings:
    there is on “layerslider first window” on top right a gear icon which opens the settings dialog for gloabl settings of layerslider.
    If you have opend one slider – you got on the top left “Project Settings” here are the performance settings for the specified slider.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.