Dear Kriesi,
Congratulations for the great WYSIWIG and fully intuitive Enfold Theme you have developed.
For me is clearly the best ever WP Theme, inclusive better than the Avada Theme, and the one which I better like to work with. Have not any doubt of it.
I appreciate your efforts to increase the number and quality of feature design Layouts, Content and Media Elements you provide in all your Theme upgrades.
For this reason I wrote to kindly ask you to improve the general look and feature characteristics of the Accordion and Tabs Menus you are offering in Enfold, which I utilice a lot in my website developments.
Accordion Menus – Ideas,…
http://theme-fusion.com/avada/accordion-toggles/
Tabs Menus – Ideas,…
http://theme-fusion.com/avada/tabs/
More Divider Styles – Ideas,…
http://theme-fusion.com/avada/dividers/
Tell me please what do you think about my suggestion. Many thanks and best regards from Madrid, Adolfo

• This reply was modified 12 years, 1 month ago by ahauber.

Hey tcoq!

Yes it’s a limitation of the Enfold breadcrumb. We’ll improve it in the next version – for now open up /wp-content/themes/enfold/framework/php/class-breadcrumb.php and replace

		if('post' == $post_type)
		{
			$category = get_the_category();
			$ID = $category[0]->cat_ID;

			 $parents = get_category_parents($ID, TRUE, '$$$', FALSE );
			 $parents = explode("$$$", $parents);
			 foreach ($parents as $parent_item)
			 {
			 	if($parent_item) $trail[] = $parent_item;
			 }
		}

with

		if('post' == $post_type)
		{
			$category = get_the_category();

            foreach($category as $cat)
            {
                if(!empty($cat->parent))
                {
                    $parents = get_category_parents($cat->cat_ID, TRUE, '$$$', FALSE );
                    $parents = explode("$$$", $parents);
                    foreach ($parents as $parent_item)
                    {
                        if($parent_item) $trail[] = $parent_item;
                    }

                    break;
                }
            }
		}

Cheers!
Peter

Hi!

If you really want to overwrite the function you can try if following code works

add_action( 'plugins_loaded', 'avia_wpml_seo_fix' );
function avia_wpml_seo_fix(){
                global $sitepress;
                remove_action('wp_head', array($sitepress, 'head_langs'));
                if($sitepress->settings['seo']['head_langs']){
                                add_action('wp_head', 'avia_wpml_head_langs');    
                }
}

function avia_wpml_head_langs(){
        global $sitepress;
        $languages = $sitepress->get_ls_languages(array('skip_missing' => true));
        foreach($languages as $code => $lang){
            if($code != $sitepress->get_current_language()){
                if(is_home() || is_front_page()) $lang['url'] = $sitepress->language_url($lang['language_code']);
                printf('<link rel="alternate" hreflang="%s" href="%s" />' . PHP_EOL,  $sitepress->get_language_tag($code), str_replace('&', '&', $lang['url']));
            }
        }    
}

I didn’t test it and we probably won’t include it in the theme files but maybe you can use it as a temporary solution until the WPML devs add a filter to the head_langs function.

Cheers!
Peter

Hey!

Ok, I looked into the code and we can’t fix this. The head_langs() function in wp-content\plugins\sitepress-multilingual-cms\sitepress.class.php doesn’t allow us to change the url (there’s no filter / hook which would allow us to replace the url). You can try to contact the WPML support team – maybe they can provide an useful tip or they can add a filter to the function in the next version. Otherwise I recommend to use the Yoast workaround mentioned above and to deactivate the WPML seo setting.

We’d need to overwrite the entire head_langs function at the moment which I don’t want especially because the plugin core files/functions may change and this would break our theme.

Regards,
Peter

Hi!

We’ll look into it. If we can find a workaround on our end we’ll include a fix, otherwise I think the Yoast plugin solution is better anyway because you’ve more control over the output.

Regards,
Peter