-
AuthorPosts
-
February 27, 2015 at 3:04 pm #403436
Hi guys.
Using alt-tags and titles and all, many pictures used in Enfold sites nicely show up in Google Search Results. Yet, I used Google’s testing tool (developers.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool/) when I found out some images never got anywhere, and this is what it says:
<a href="http://www.yvons-fotostudio.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/920980_254483678009903_730441292_o.jpg" class='post-1046 attachment type-attachment status-inherit hentry av-masonry-entry isotope-item av-masonry-item-with-image' title="Bruidsfotografie - Yvon's Fotostudio, Papendrecht" itemprop="contentURL" ><div class='av-inner-masonry-sizer'></div><figure class='av-inner-masonry main_color'><div class="av-masonry-outerimage-container"><div class="av-masonry-image-container" style="background-image: url(https://www.yvons-fotostudio.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/920980_254483678009903_730441292_o-470x705.jpg);"><img src="http://www.yvons-fotostudio.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/920980_254483678009903_730441292_o-470x705.jpg" title="Bruidsfotografie – Yvon’s Fotostudio, Papendrecht" alt="Trouwreportage Papendrecht Dordrecht Alblasserdam" /></div></div></figure></a>
And indeed, the error message (Google herkent de property contentUrl niet voor een object van het type WebPage.) corresponds with the fact that these images in the masonry gallery seem not at all to be recognized and indexed by Google. So… guys? Do I need to use another type of gallery? Or is this a bug or so that can be fixed? Because these images, on 6 pages, concerning about 40 photos in total, are key to my clients local existence and future success. Kind of crucial ;)
Thanks in advance!
RemcoMarch 1, 2015 at 8:34 am #404040Hey Remco!
Thank you for using Enfold.
Try to add this to the Quick CSS field:
.av-fixed-size .av-masonry-image-container img { display: block; }
Let us know what happens.
Best regards,
IsmaelMarch 2, 2015 at 4:03 pm #404497Hmmmmm… I really thought – based on my experience – uploading and optimizing the images, manually adding the page URL to Google’s indexing tool, and then waiting 4-5 days would do. And so I came to a conclusion. Apparently an incorrect one: Googling today for the keywords I entered DOES lead to showing these images in the search results.
Sorry for making you wonder and come up with that code, mr. Ismael Penn, sir ;) It seems to be okay after all. I guess I should simply ignore the testing tool warnings, wouldn’t you say?
March 3, 2015 at 6:17 am #404948 -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.