Look at my images. Thanks
FIREFOX:
CHROME:
There is a difference between Firefox and Chrome for this line;
OK:
<div class=”img_wrapper” style=”display: inline-block; width: 309px; height: 398px;”>……
NOT OK:
<div class=”img_wrapper” style=”display: inline-block; width: 747px; height: 505px;”>……
Do you have a solution for that?
thanks :)
Hey!
I set it to private.
Best regards,
Peter
sorry :)
I use the same thing than: http://www.agarkitekter.se/medarbetare/
as discussed here: https://kriesi.at/support/topic/enfold-showcase/page/6/#post-226150
but his site has no issue with chrome… :-(
yes i know it’s a custom stuff butI i would like to use it…
Hey!
In this case I recommend to contact the website administrator of http://www.agarkitekter.se/medarbetare/ – maybe he can help you. We can’t provide support for customized code.
Regards,
Peter
I understant Dude, bu maybe you can just tell me what he had used ? I do not see any <div id=”av-masonry-1″
in his source code…
Hi!
I think he uses the default portfolio grid element.
Cheers!
Peter
Yes…
Nevermind, I find a better way (no JS), just apply a CSS classe named, i.e.: grayscale and:
.greyscale img {
filter: url("data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns=\'http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\'><filter id=\'grayscale\'><feColorMatrix type=\'matrix\' values=\'0.3333 0.3333 0.3333 0 0 0.3333 0.3333 0.3333 0 0 0.3333 0.3333 0.3333 0 0 0 0 0 1 0\'/></filter></svg>#grayscale"); /* Firefox 3.5+, IE10 */
filter: gray; /* IE6-9 */
-webkit-filter: grayscale(100%); /* Chrome 19+ & Safari 6+ */
-webkit-transition: all .6s ease; /* Fade to color for Chrome and Safari */
-webkit-backface-visibility: hidden; /* Fix for transition flickering */
}
.greyscale img:hover {
filter: none;
-webkit-filter: grayscale(0%);
}
And it works better
Hi!
Great :)
Best regards,
Peter