-
AuthorPosts
-
February 22, 2019 at 8:33 pm #1070473
Website: dev.henleyherald.com
In the header in the Social Bookmarks area there is a Subscribe button to allow a user to subscribe to the site.
The width of the individual icon container is set by
#top .social_bookmarks li { width: 36px;}
The Subscribe button image is 113px wide but by using this CSS
.html_bottom_nav_header #top .av-logo-container .social_bookmarks { right: 83px;}
…I shift the outer ul element and the image flows out right of the container and displays in full.
I want to display the social icons block in the socket. This is enabled on the site but if you have a look at it, you will see the problem.
I have shifted the ul element in the socket in a similar manner by
#socket .social_bookmarks { right: 83px;}
…but the image does not overflow the li element as it does in the header because of this in the Enfold code:
#socket .social_bookmarks li {overflow: hidden;}
I have tried all sorts of combinations of CSS to target the li element of Subscribe (social_bookmarks_subscribe av-social-link-subscribe social_icon_5) and change it to overflow:visible but without success. I also need to remove the border-radius on the element.
Please can you tell me the correct CSS to get this to work?
- This topic was modified 5 years, 10 months ago by zimbo.
February 25, 2019 at 7:18 pm #1071423Hey zimbo,
Could you please attach a mockup of what you’re trying to achieve?
Could you please give us a link to your website, we need more context to be able to help you.
Best regards,
VictoriaFebruary 25, 2019 at 7:52 pm #1071446The website address is the first line of the original post.
I also stated “if you have a look at it (on the site), you will see the problem.”
I want the Subscribe button in the socket to display as it does in the header.
March 1, 2019 at 5:15 am #1072869Hi,
Thanks for that. Please try the following in Quick CSS under Enfold->General Styling:
#socket .social_icon_5 { width:120px; border-radius:0; }
Best regards,
RikardMarch 1, 2019 at 2:48 pm #1073205Thanks Rikard, it worked when I added !important to both.
March 2, 2019 at 10:39 pm #1073756Hi zimbo,
Glad you got it working for you! :)
If you need further assistance please let us know.
Best regards,
Victoria -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.