-
AuthorPosts
-
October 25, 2014 at 10:36 am #340929
Hi!
I’m using the great theme enfold!
While uploading images there are several size-variations automatically generated i.e. myPicture-450×303.jpg, myPicture-1500×430.jpg etc.My original picture ist 1800×1200 with 89KB.
The generated file 1210×423 is 90KB, the file 1500×1010 with 170KB is at least two times bigger than my original file ( with a smaller resolution ).I think this would give an bad performance when the smaller resolution images ( which have a bigger size ) are loaded on mobile devices..
So where do i have to do some settings to fix this or is an special plugin necessary?
Greetings
RobertOctober 27, 2014 at 3:27 am #341305Hi suppenhuhn!
Thank you for using Enfold.
Please try to use this plugin: https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-smushit/
Best regards,
IsmaelMarch 14, 2017 at 10:31 pm #761003Has there ever been a resolution to this? I am very good at optimizing images, and I have my landing screen banners loading in at ~40kb at 1280×450, however when I upload they become 1024×450 and gain an extra 20kb. What gives?
Even when uploading these, using EWW optimizer, and then WP Smush, and then EWW again, the images are still larger than when I originally export them from Photoshop. I have clients uploading images that aren’t optimized, and those are giant. Using a 3rd party plugin to resolve a theme issue doesn’t seem like a good fix.
March 14, 2017 at 10:39 pm #761007a bit offtopic but in the same direction:
Wordpress itself got an image quality tool – this is in a good meaning but if the image creator knows his job excellent sometimes the 90% jpg is bad quality but more space. To avoid this from wp induced process add this to functions.php child-theme:add_filter( 'jpeg_quality', create_function( '', 'return 100;' ) );
September 28, 2018 at 7:40 am #1015597i do have now on the most sites i create this to my child-theme functions.php :
function av_return_100(){ return 65; } add_filter('jpeg_quality', 'av_return_100'); add_filter('wp_editor_set_quality', 'av_return_100');
it seems that this is more than a good compromise between performance and quality
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.