Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 8, 2018 at 2:08 am in reply to: masonry portfolio items perfect grid no switch to column count screen options #1031051
That seem to work — thanks!
I was having the same issue, but when I clicked the Save All Changes button (where the loader was just hung/spinning), reloaded the page (and cleared the cache), went back to the Them Update pane, and got the “last we checked could not validate” error, I just clicked the Revalidate or remove token button and then it validated.
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 2 months ago by
sky19er.
Sorry, that was just a typo — the folder name never changed — just the css file. So, any idea how I can get my options panel functioning again? And what’s all this stuff in this dev folder — https://screencast.com/t/d7vNGkuwHSZ2 — is that stuff you guys put there? Can I get rid of all that now?
And I can handle the breadcrumb issue with the Breadcrumbs Hierarchy option in the Portfolio Items — I don’t need that function.
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by
sky19er.
Hey, I just noticed/remembered today about the option to set a Breadcrumb Hierarchy for portfolio options — that’s the only reason I was trying to run a child theme on this site — because I thought I had to implement this code to handle the issue with my portfolio items not showing the right breadcrumb hierarchy: https://kriesi.at/support/topic/portfolio-items-shows-wrong-category-in-breadcrumbs/#post-185969.
So, I switched back to the parent theme and renamed that css file in the dynami_-avia folder to enfold.css, but now my theme’s still not registering changes to the General Styles pane.
Can you help me get back to where I was?
OK, I updated to 7.2, disabled all plugins, and changed the logo area Primary and Highlight colors to black, but the change had no effect on the front-end. Any other ideas?
Thanks.
Thanks, but I followed your instructions — disabled all plugins and changed the logo area primary color from red to blue and it doesn’t seem to have any effect on the front end.
September 20, 2018 at 1:03 pm in reply to: Custom Map Marker Image Size : Won't Display at 80x80px #1012280Thanks, but now I seem to be having an issue implementing child themes (see https://kriesi.at/support/topic/child-theme-has-no-css/#post-1012180).
Sure… FYI, I just tried switching to a child theme on another site and ran into the same issue. Maybe something about a recent update… or, of course, could be some new combination of things I’m doing/using.
Thanks!
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by
sky19er.
September 19, 2018 at 7:19 pm in reply to: Custom Map Marker Image Size : Won't Display at 80x80px #1011989Finally got around to trying this — the thumbnails do seem to have changed to 160×169 — a thumbnail that size even shows in the Edit Location dialog box (see screen grab: https://screencast.com/t/g89g0UQ8FmnY ), but the largest option in the dropdown is still 80×80, and it’s still showing as 40×40 on the front end.
Any other ideas?
Thanks!
I didn’t hear back from you for a bit, so I restored that dynamic_avia folder and reactivated the parent theme, so the site doesn’t look broken in the time being. Please let me know if/when I can try something else. Thanks.
OK, I tried that but it doesn’t seem to be working. The folder doesn’t seem to be recreating. I tried moving the old folder up to the root, too, FYI. Now neither child nor parent is working, of course.
Yes, please do — sorry; should’ve mentioned that you could. Thanks!
Well, I only need vertical parallax — it sounded like you were saying I might need to enlarge it horizontally. But that’s basically what I’ve found, from my research, is that the only way to get something looking truly responsive is to actually create different sliders for the various screen widths. Then, you don’t technically “enlarge” the image, but I change the aspect ratio fo the canvas so, yes, for the narrower, portrait, mobile viewports, the image gets cropped on the sides, allowing for more of a square or even portrait layout. Then you can use the Settings > Mobile > Hide Under/Over to show/hide the sliders depending on the screen width. Very cumbersome, but it does result, effectively, in parallax for mobile.
Please let me/us know if you hear of way of creating a truly responsive, full-width, parallax section without having to create three different layer sliders ;)
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by
sky19er.
Yes, I’m using the image as a layer — I don’t think you can get a parallax with just a background, can you? And I don’t want to increase the width of the image wider than the canvas — we still want to show the whole image on the desktop version. Any other ideas?
Thanks!
Thanks for the parallax suggestion — since my client wants the parallax to work on phones, the layerslider seems like the way to go (seem to be working in mobile). But I can’t figure out how to get the layerslider to be more responsive — I’d like it to cover more height in portrait layouts (crop off some of the sides of the images, so it can cover more height). I have the layout set to responsive in the layerslider, and I’ve tinkered with the options, but I haven’t been able to achieve that yet — do you know how to do that? It’s the garden/playhouse shot, about half-way down http://b8n.e86.myftpupload.com/
Thanks!
Thanks. The client is being very adamant about wanting parallax on mobile, and the parallax in the layerslider element seems to actually be working in mobile. Now I’m just having trouble to get the layerslider to be more responsive (to get it to crop a little off the sides of the image, so it covers more height on mobile/portrait screens. I’ll also follow up in this other thread where you mention using the layerslider parallax: https://kriesi.at/support/topic/fullscreen-slider-parallax-only-on-bottom/#post-1008755
Thanks!
OK, thanks — I’ll pass that on to the client.
How about for something like Montserrat Light Italic? I’m trying to use Montserrat Light for my headings and Montserrat Light Italic for my body font. I have the following code in the child theme. Montserrat 300 shows at the bottom of both font lists in the General Styling options, but I”m not seeing Montserrat:300i in the body font list, and selecting those still just seems to give me Montserrat Regular. Is my code correct? I have this site in Maintenance Mode, so I’ll provide credentials.
Thanks!
.
`<?php/* ADD GOOGLE FONT */
add_filter( ‘avf_google_heading_font’, ‘avia_add_heading_font’);
function avia_add_heading_font($fonts)
{
$fonts[‘Montserrat:300’] = ‘Montserrat:300’;
return $fonts;
}add_filter( ‘avf_google_content_font’, ‘avia_add_content_font’);
function avia_add_content_font($fonts)
{
$fonts[‘Montserrat:300i’] = ‘Montserrat:300i’;
return $fonts;
}-
This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by
Basilis.
August 28, 2018 at 2:07 am in reply to: Custom Map Marker Image Size : Won't Display at 80x80px #1002488Ah, so I guess she sent me something in the private field, not realizing I wouldn’t be able to see it.
Anyway, yes, as I noted in my original post, I uploaded the marker at 220x220px.
I can see in the code that the 80×80 image is being pulled/used, but the css still says 40×40 in two places (see: https://screencast.com/t/extoWWaJl ). But like Victoria said, changing the css in the inspector doesn’t seem to work.
Any other ideas?
August 24, 2018 at 6:58 pm in reply to: Custom Map Marker Image Size : Won't Display at 80x80px #1001344Thanks, Rikard, but Iwhy would I not be able to see a moderator’s response to my comment just because I didn’t start the thread? Why can I see your response and not her’s? And I see how it doesn’t seem to be reacting to css changes — interesting! So, is she / are you still looking into this?
Thanks!
August 24, 2018 at 2:43 am in reply to: Custom Map Marker Image Size : Won't Display at 80x80px #1001017I don’t see any content in your last post — just Hi and Best regards — did you mean to say/add something?
August 22, 2018 at 5:57 pm in reply to: Custom Map Marker Image Size : Won't Display at 80x80px #1000448Sure, I put the credentials in the Private Content… but ohhh, I think I just figured it out in trying to explain, here: The issue is in the maps on both the home page and contact page (http://storeyfitness.com/contact/). I see the element is pulling the 80×80 image — http://storeyfitness.com/wp-content/uploads/storey-fitness-220-bw-1-80×80.png — but I think the issue might be that it only shows as 40×40 on my retina screen. I just got this new macbook pro laptop and I’m just learning about that issue. If you agree, any suggestions s to how to counter that? I still don’t quite understand the issue. Thanks!
August 21, 2018 at 8:23 pm in reply to: Custom Map Marker Image Size : Won't Display at 80x80px #999998Thanks, but I saw that thread and, while I didn’t read it thoroughly, it looks to me like that’s referring to a request to set a CUSTOM marker size — I’m just trying to figure out why the options/sizes already available in the element don’t seem to be working. I.e., why, when I set the option to 80x80pz is it still showing at 40x40px? I think axlright, above had the same question.
August 21, 2018 at 4:22 am in reply to: Custom Map Marker Image Size : Won't Display at 80x80px #999663I’m having the same issue, here, at http://storeyfitness.com/contact/ — I uploaded the marker at 220x220px and set the custom size in the map element to 80x80px, but it seems to be “stuck” at 40x40px — cleared my cache to no avail. Any clues for us?
You can close it. Thanks.
OK, great, and thanks ;)
Thanks, Rikard, but that still left what looked like an empty column to the right of the content and left of the sidebar:
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s320/sh/e239d2ae-8e28-4673-8c67-3ae4729f81a1/4c32cbfc21698e9b6a0f147871c6b8a2
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s320/sh/f1f713c5-dc23-49ef-8bfa-bb24c571ce9f/b725e132e98742276e9fae72dd472cd5I added some css which seems to handle that, but I’m not sure if it’s the best method or if it will maybe negatively affect other things in the site.
Also, the iPad Pro portrait layout — at 1024px wide — is wide enough to accommodate the right column, so I dropped the max width down to 1023px — maybe there’s a better/lower, more standard width I should use for that?
Finally, I left in my css for reducing the padding in the content and sidebar, for the iPad Pro portrait layout, since it was still a tad cramped.
So here’s what I ended up with, in total (including what you sent me above) — please let me know if you see any problems with this or have any suggestions for improvement, streamlining, etc.
Thanks!
/* MOVE SIDEBAR DOWN BELOW CONTENT IN TABLET PORTRAIT VIEW */ @media only screen and (min-device-width : 768px) and (max-device-width : 1023px) and (orientation : portrait) { .container .av-content-small.units { width: 100% !important; } .content .entry-content-wrapper { padding-right: 0; } .content { border-right: none; } .inner_sidebar { margin-left: 0; } #top #main .sidebar { border-left: none; overflow: visible; } } /* REDUCE PADDING IN IPAD PRO PORTRAIT VIEW */ @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1024px) and (orientation : portrait) { .container { padding: 0px 30px; } .content, .sidebar { padding-top: 20px; } .inner_sidebar { margin-left: 30px; } }-
This reply was modified 7 years, 5 months ago by
sky19er.
Well, the site’s still in development, so I’d have to give you credentials to view it, but here’s a screen grab as an example — https://www.evernote.com/shard/s320/sh/ec51a205-d48a-4f28-9aa6-691cce92340d/232322d2f620236a3355e1f253484ba6 — see how all the columns are cramped — especially the sidebar (and this is after I’ve already done some work to remove some padding there). This has always been a problem with Enfold’s iPad portrait layouts, in my opinion — that view is too narrow for a sidebar, and if there’s a sidebar, there’s not enough room for two columns in the body area.
Thanks and leet me know if you have any other questions.
OK, thanks — yep; close it.
Hmm, I ‘m not sure what I might have done, but all of the sudden the sidebar navigation for the new/2nd site I referred to above has the same/good styling as the first site — any idea what might have happened here?
Thanks and sorry for the false alarm, I guess ;)
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 2 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts
