Hi Josue,

Disabling the markup is not a solution, I need something similar to the fix that Kriesi did for the same issue on the Navigation element. Do you know what did he do to fix that same error?

Thank you,
George

Thank you Ismael!

I have designed the complete plugin but I’m having someone else doing the code. He asked me about what framework I want to use and I have read a few posts here that Bootstrap could have conflicts with Enfold so that’s why I’m asking you guys to make sure.

I will be using complex Google maps along with data lists using Bootstrap grid and customized Bootstrap sliders so I would appreciate it if Kriesi chimes in with his opinion on any possible conflicts that Bootstrap might have with Enfold.

Thanks again!
George

Hi Elliott!

Brilliant! As you suggested I replaced ‘image_url’ with ‘image_link’ on line 576 in the masonry_entries.php file and then created a new case for ‘image_link’ on the helper-markup.php file that returns ‘itemprop’ = ‘significantLink’ and now both properties for images without a link to a page and for images with a link to a page return the correct markup without producing errors.

Shouldn’t this fix be added as a permanent fix to the upcoming theme’s update since it also solves the errors on the demo pages?

Thank you very much for your help… You are brilliant!

Best regards,
George

Hi Elliott,

Thank you for looking into this! I added the code below at the end of the functions.php that removes the “hentry” class if it’s a page and it fixed the first error “missing updated & author”.

 function ga_remove_hentry( $classes ) {
    if ( is_page() ) {
        $classes = array_diff( $classes, array( 'hentry' ) );
    }
    return $classes;
}
add_filter( 'post_class','ga_remove_hentry' );

I still need a fix for the second issue reporting that “contenturl” is not part of the “schema.org/webpage” markup. I think that the proper way to fix this is by having a conditional code in functions.php file to replace the “contenturl” markup that comes from “schema.or/imageobject” with “significantLink” or even just a “URL” markup ONLY for images that link to a page, but I don’t know how to code this.

Thank you,
George

Hi Elliott,

Thank you for the reply! As I mentioned above, I do use a page to display as the frontpage and I have selected to Display the title only on the Title bar as you also suggested but that does work when Transparent Header is selected. It works with the normal header but NOT with the transparent.

Using a special heading element or a code block is also not an option as this places the heading either above or below the slider and not on top of the slider…. unless custom css is used in which case it overlaps with the sliders title and caption.

There should be a code that places the page’s title in an h1 tag that search engines see above everything else on the content even though a transparent header is used and that heading doesn’t actual show on the page.

Thank you,
George

Hi Ismael,

This code worked. It removed the themes map api as I needed,

Thank you!
George

Hi Kriesi,

Thank you for the reply! I can see that the warning was manually added to the wpseo-mod.js file and I understand why you did this.

The problem that I have is that up until the Enfold version 2.8.1 the theme and Yoast SEO plugin were working perfectly fine together. The plugin could in fact see all keywords within a page built with the advanced layout builder. The problems started with the theme’s v2.9 update and got really bad on this latest 3.0.2 update.

By looking at certain keyword results performance in google, I can tell you with certainty that the front end also has a big issue with the keywords on pages built with the ALB. As I mention above, my site was top 3 on google for it’s main keywords for over 8 years and lasted up until the theme’s v2.8.1. It started slipping to the bottom of the first page after the 2.9 update and right after the 3.0.2 update it dropped to the 3rd and 4th page.

What’s the point of using the Yoast plugin if we cannot use it’s extremely valuable page analysis for the selected keywords on content built with ALB and what’s the point of using Enfold to built a very nice looking site when the site cannot easily be found on google?

Is there a way that I can go back on using the 2.8.1 version of Enfold when everything was working right without also having to downgrade the 4.0 version of WP? This latest 3.0.2 version of the theme has made it a liability for my business.

Thank you,
George

Hi Josh,

Thank you very much! It now works great on iPad portrait screen. I made a small change on the code, changed media screen to 1024 size and it now also works on iPad’s landscape screen the same way it used to work before the update to v3.0.

Thank you again,
George

Hey Arvish,

If you take the time to read this thread from the beginning you might realize that the “customization” that I wanted was just to replace the ‘click’ with ‘mouseover’ code.

However after some reading and research on the Google maps implementation, it turns out that this simple “customization doesn’t work because the map element is NOT coded according to the Google best practice suggestion guidelines as it can be seen at the Google Maps – Developers section here: https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/javascript/infowindows#add

Best practices: For the best user experience, only one info window should be open on the map at any one time. Multiple info windows make the map appear cluttered. If you only need one info window at a time, you can create just one InfoWindow object and open it at different locations or markers upon map events, such as user clicks. If you do need more than one info window, you can display multiple InfoWindow objects at the same time.

Suggesting that I hire an outside coder to fix the map element so it is coded according to Google’s best practices is not a customization but a fix for the element that was not properly coded.

I hope that the above link makes it clear that this is no longer a help for customization request but a request to code the element based on best practices.

Best regards,
George

Hi Ismael,

Thank you again! This last code works fine if you only have 2-3 markers on the map. Currently having 20 markers with plans to add at least 50 more, it makes it the worst solution as it opens many infoWindows on hove which cover the markers and it’s impossible to click on them to close the open infoWindows.

Reading the Google suggestions and best practice on infoWindows here: https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/javascript/infowindows#add as well as seeing several other solutions on github, only one infoWindow shall be open at any given time when having multiple markers. This is achieved by creating the infoWindow before creating the marker. in other words the

var infowindow = new google.maps.InfoWindow({
      content: info
  });

code must be outside and before the code that creates the marker that the infoWindow will open upon an event as it is shown on the Google suggestions and on several other sites. Here’s the simplest example: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1875596/have-just-one-infowindow-open-in-google-maps-api-v3

I tried moving it but since it is coded a bit different on the theme and I’m really bad coding java, I’m not sure where to move that infoWindow code so I break the element.

By looking at the Google example and the other site’s code example above, do you have any suggestions on what to replace on the theme’s code to make it work by opening just one infoWindow at a time?

Thank you very much for your help!
George

Thank you very much for the code. It works as it should!

The only problem I have with this code now is that as soon as I move the mouse from the marker the tooltip closes right away before it allows to click on the links inside the tooltip, so basically this solution makes the tooltip unusable if there are links in it. Sorry, my bad I didn’t think about this.

Is there an option for the tooltip on a marker to stay open until another marker (not just moving the mouse away) is hovered or clicked to allow time to click on the tooltip’s links? Although I’ve seen this done, especially on sites with home listings on a map, I realize that this option requires a lot of additional code. So I guess the easiest option would be for to use the “click” option to open a tooltip on a marker and then when another marker is clicked and the new tooltip opens the previous one closes.

So far I use the code below which allows for the tooltip to open on click and then when the map is clicked it closes all open tooltips.

google.maps.event.addListener(marker, 'click', function() {
				    infowindow.open(map,marker);
				});
				
				google.maps.event.addListener(map, 'click', function() {
				    infowindow.close(map,marker);
				});

What code can I use instead so when a new marker is clicked and a new tooltip opens the previous tooltip closes?

Thank you so much for your help,
George