Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Thanks. I did see that same code you found, but I tried a few spots to insert it within Enfold, but it didn’t work or look the same. Where would this code need to be insert within Enfold? Would a child theme be needed?
I have confirmed the same error on 3 enfold sites I support on 3 different servers. In all the cases, they all have the same issue and when editing the menu you get an error. Below are the details. Will there be a patch or update soon?
When seeking help with this issue, you may be asked for some of the following information:
WordPress version 5.4.2
Current theme: Enfold (version 4.7.5)
Current plugin: Ultimate Member (version 2.1.6) PHP version 7.3.18Error Details
=============
An error of type E_ERROR was caused in line 59 of the file /home/xxxxxx/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-member/includes/admin/core/class-admin-navmenu.php. Error message: Uncaught ArgumentCountError: Too few arguments to function um\admin\core\Admin_Navmenu::wp_nav_menu_item_custom_fields(), 4 passed in /home/xxxxxx/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php on line 287 and exactly 5 expected in /home/xxxxxx/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-member/includes/admin/core/class-admin-navmenu.php:59
Stack trace:
#0 /home/xxxxxx/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php(287): um\admin\core\Admin_Navmenu->wp_nav_menu_item_custom_fields(’54’, Object(WP_Post), 0, Object(stdClass))
#1 /home/xxxxxx/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php(311): WP_Hook->apply_filters(NULL, Array)
#2 /home/xxxxxx/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php(478): WP_Hook->do_action(Array)
#3 /home/xxxxxx/public_html/wp-content/themes/enfold/framework/php/class-megamenu.php(534): do_action(‘wp_nav_menu_ite…’, ’54’, Object(WP_Post), 0, Object(stdClass))
#4 /home/xxxxxx/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-walker.php(144): avia_backend_walker->start_elResolved – Since posting this, Enfold 4.7.3 was released. We updated both sites, and the issues were fixed for both Gravity Forms and The Events Calendar.
The plugins themselves worked fine with other themes that we tested. The previous version of Enfold and WordPress had the issue. We had tested our sites on 3 servers as well to see it was a local server config or an issue with with zlib compression was happening and disabling zlib compression didn’t fix the issue on these accounts. Here is the error we were getting on both sites
failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (0) in /home/XXXXXX/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4552
Solved: After turning off the paid version of the WP ADA Compliance Check plugin the images started to rotate again. We will contact them and let them know it is an issue with there plugin.
Reviewed the fix link and downloaded the file to replace asset-manager.class.php
Tried it 2 times, cleared cache, turned off all plugins, reactivated theme, same result. The URL of the site domain is still loading twice.Yes, we have tried moving the layers around. Right now the HTML layer you had us add is the second layer, so now it does look better and it shows the way we want, but the link from the featured image to the blog post it is associated with is being blocked. It seems you would have to add the gradient code on the same layer of the slide. Is there any way to do that in a Dynamic Layer?
Can a div wrap be put around the [image] tag that is in the content window for this layer?
We tried just adding custom css to the dynamic layer and nothing shows or works.
If it is possible, how it it be done, and where would the css code need to be? Within layerslider or the theme?Thanks. We just updated the site with your suggestion. See site link below now.
What happens is that the HTML layer is added above the Dynamic link layer. Because it is a different layer, it disables the link to the article completely, and it also fills in over the text and the image.
We were looking just to have a darker background under the text only, fading the image a bit, but keeping the title text white.
I think the css for the overlay for the gradient has to be done within the same layer some how. Let me know what you suggest.I tried that CSS update and it basically made it appear like it does by default with having the footer background stop at the socket.
With the CSS Yigit posted, that got us close and it worked in Chrome, just not in Firefox or Edge.
Is there anything else we can try? Thanks in advance.Thanks, Yigit. I was just double checking everything, and getting some new screen shots ready for you, I just wanted to be sure all the site and server cache was cleared, and then testing in all browsers. After checking everything I did see the suggested updates you sent are working 100% in Chrome. If you see the new attached file, a white bar/row is showing at the bottom in the latest version of FireFox and Edge. Let me know if there is something that can be added to adjust for that in those browsers? Thanks.
Thanks Yigit. I put the code in you suggested and those does give the desired effect I was looking for. I removed all the footer.php code I had in place. If you look at the site link now there is a bottom bar, like the socket showing. Any suggestions for this. Thanks in advance.
I’m having issues trying to wrap the container for the footer and socket in one div.
My first div starts here:
<div>
<div class=’container_wrap footer_color’ id=’footer’><!– ####### END SOCKET CONTAINER ####### –>
</footer>
</div> — This is the bottom div.I already have a dev site up on this. See link. I tried a few things to get it to work, and can’t seem to find the right area to adjust.
I could not find anything within the Enfold Support on the site. Would it be CSS only or would a child theme have to be used as well?
View the footer area of this site. The background image stretches from the footer over the socket as well. It is another theme, but wanted to know if it was possible.
Server is on PHP 5.6.
Updating the theme using FTP will work and we have been doing this for a while.
What folder location with the theme setup should we look at that might be causing the issue?Chrome is the issue, compare the links I sent and you will see a difference. In chrome only something is rendering those thumbnails.
