Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 15, 2025 at 12:04 pm in reply to: Footer visibility problem in Safari (Enfold 6.0.9) #1477140
Hi,
Maybe I found the cause of the problem that can be useful to find a solution.Check please link in Private Content, and please tell me if you think there could be a fix in a next Enfold update.
Best regards,
OrianoFebruary 14, 2025 at 5:40 pm in reply to: Footer visibility problem in Safari (Enfold 6.0.9) #1477126Hi,
I did not specify it, but this footer display problem with Safari 18.3 on Mac M1 with Sonoma 14.7.3, I have it on all sites where I am using Enfold (I have several licences).
Please can you at least help me with a temporary solution?
Best regards,
OrianoFebruary 14, 2025 at 8:43 am in reply to: Footer visibility problem in Safari (Enfold 6.0.9) #1477108Hi Ismael, thanks for your help.
I entered your CSS in Quick CSS Theme Options, but this does not solve the problem.
See the screenshotYou may need to toggle or temporarily disable the Enfold > Performance > File Compression settings after adding the css.
• All Compressions are deactivated.
• I have also deactivated the cache plugin.
• I have also tried using Enfold parent. No luck.Could you find someone on your staff who can do a test with Safari 18.3 on Mac M1 with Sonoma 14.7.3?
Best regards,
OrianoFebruary 13, 2025 at 8:46 am in reply to: Footer visibility problem in Safari (Enfold 6.0.9) #1477032Hi
> Please check its styles while it’s focused or selected in the browser inspector and provide a screenshot of the computed styles if possible.
Is this the screenshot you’re asking for?
Regards,
OrianoFebruary 13, 2025 at 8:34 am in reply to: Footer visibility problem in Safari (Enfold 6.0.9) #1477031Hi Ismael,
here a screen video.Best regards,
OrianoFebruary 13, 2025 at 8:25 am in reply to: Footer visibility problem in Safari (Enfold 6.0.9) #1477029Sorry Ismael, maybe I did not explain myself well.
The problem occurs on Safari 18.3 installed in a MacBookPro M1 with Sonoma System 14.7.3 and not in Safari 17.0.
Here the screenshot Firefox Version 135.0 (aarch64)
Here the screenshot Chrome Version 18.3 (19620.2.4.111.8, 19620)
Here the screenshot Safari Version 18.3 (19620.2.4.111.8, 19620)All three browsers are installed on my MacBookPro M1, Sonoma 14.7.3.
Thank you for your help.Best regards,
OrianoFebruary 12, 2025 at 4:57 pm in reply to: Footer visibility problem in Safari (Enfold 6.0.9) #1476969Hi Rikard,
> It’s displaying fine on my end using Safari 18.1.1, is the problem only present in the version that you are running?
Is present only in Safari 18.3 on MacBookPro M1, Sonoma 14.7.3.
I have try Safari 18.3 (18620.2.4.111.8, 18620) on iMac Intel, Ventura 13.7.3, and the socket is displayed correctly.
So the problem seems to be only on Safari 18.3 on MacBookPro M1, Sonoma 14.7.3.
Consider that I have also tried using Enfold (and not the Child theme), but this does not solve the problem.
I have deactivated all cache options and cleaned the browser cache… but even this does not solve the problem :(Best regards,
OrianoOctober 1, 2024 at 3:42 pm in reply to: Gravity Forms Orbital theme and Avia Layout Builder #1468183Hi Rikard,
thank for help 😳Best regards
OrianoOctober 1, 2024 at 12:18 pm in reply to: Gravity Forms Orbital theme and Avia Layout Builder #1468165Hi Rikard, please see screenvideo on Private Content
October 1, 2024 at 11:33 am in reply to: Gravity Forms Orbital theme and Avia Layout Builder #1468161Hi Rikard,
When I install a Gravity Forms on a page with Default WordPress Block Editor, I have the option to format the Gravity Forms using Gravity Form Theme “Orbital Theme” (see link in Private content).
But if I want to install a Gravity Form on a page created with Advanced Layout Builder, I am obliged to use an Avia Text Block, and I do not have the possibility to customize the graphics of the Gravity Forms via Orbital Theme :(
Is there a way to get Gravity Forms Orbital Theme options even when the Gravity Form is on an Advanced Layout Builder page?
Best regards,
OrianoFebruary 14, 2024 at 10:23 am in reply to: Custom Field “Hide on sigle entry”, and Gravity Forms #1434268Hi Mike, thanks for your help,
your “best solution” work fine.Perhaps your best solution will be to create a new custom field that will add a custom class to the page body and then use css to hide the featured image when ever the class is on the page.
Best regards,
OrianoFebruary 13, 2024 at 9:34 am in reply to: Custom Field “Hide on sigle entry”, and Gravity Forms #1434159Hi Mike, thanks for your help
Perhaps your best solution will be to create a new custom field that will add a custom class to the page body and then use css to hide the featured image when ever the class is on the page.
yes, I think I will try to implement this solution.
Can you please tell me, if you know, where I can find instructions on how to do this, possibly without using a plugin.
(If you can’t answer this question, I understand… it’s likely that this is not the scope of Enfold support).Best regards,
OrianoFebruary 12, 2024 at 8:35 am in reply to: Custom Field “Hide on sigle entry”, and Gravity Forms #1434060Hi Mike, thanks for help
If you don’t want the featured image to show you can use this css to hide it:
my problem is that the user who submits a post on the Enfold blog via Gravity Forms & Advanced Post Creation Add-On, should be able to choose whether the post should have the featured image or not :(
Please also watch the video (see link on Private content), where if I try to add the costum field directly from the WordPress editor, I receive an error, so maybe I’m doing something wrong?
Best regards,
OrianoFebruary 9, 2024 at 11:31 am in reply to: Custom Field “Hide on sigle entry”, and Gravity Forms #1433795Hi Ismael,
please see the screenvideo you find in Private Content.Best regards
OrianoFebruary 9, 2024 at 11:20 am in reply to: Custom Field “Hide on sigle entry”, and Gravity Forms #1433790Ismael, now this happens.
I created a post via the Gravity Form (I choose the value “false” in the _avia_hide_featured_image custom field), submit the form, and the post is saved as a draft.
Then from the Dashboard / Posts panel, I select “Preview” of the post, the browser one a page wiithe the preview of the post, an the Featured Image not displayed. Well.
But, but… when I “edit” the Post to publish it online or to schedule it online on a specific date, and save the post, the featured image appears in the post view :(I hope I explained myself :(
Could you please provide a screenshot or a short clip of the error, or the input field where you entered the custom field?
Here the error
Best regards,
OrianoFebruary 9, 2024 at 9:29 am in reply to: Custom Field “Hide on sigle entry”, and Gravity Forms #1433777Hi Ismael, thank you for your answer,
The Featured Image settings should display inside the Layout metabox just under the Header visibility and transparency settings.
yes I saw this.
But I need to give the possibility to choose to show or hide the Featured image of the post also to the user who creates a new Post via Gravity Forms.I then entered on the child theme function the code:
add_filter('avf_display_featured_image_posttypes', function($post_types) { $post_types[] = 'your_post_type'; return $post_types; }, 10, 1);
then I add the custom field “_avia_hide_featured_image” and edit Value “true”, but the response I get is “Please provide a custom field value.” :(
Find some private data below.
Best regards,
OrianoFebruary 8, 2024 at 3:43 pm in reply to: Custom Field “Hide on sigle entry”, and Gravity Forms #1433706Hi Ismael, thanks for your answer.
I entered your code, but inside the Gravity Post Creation I still only see this Custom Fields :(
- breadcrumb_parent
filesize
footer
footer_behavior
footnotes
header_title_bar
header_transparency
layout sidebarI don’t see the Enfold Custom Field featured_image that should allow me to select between the option “Show on single entry / Hide on single entry”.
Best regards,
OrianoHi Ismael, thanks for your help.
> Please add it again, then include the following css rule to hide the duplicate social icons beside the burger menu.
these are the css I have now entered:
@media only screen and (max-width: 989px) { /* Add your Mobile Styles here */ .responsive.html_mobile_menu_tablet #top #header #header_meta .social_bookmarks { display: block; } } .responsive #top #header_main .main_menu .social_bookmarks { display: none; }
Now the duplicate of the social icon is hidden.
It remains to correct, if possible, the current position of the social icon on Mobile, which is currently above the WPML icons, while I would prefer it to be online.
Best regards
OrianoHi Ismael, thanks for your answer.
Consider that in the site I use WPML and that the Header Extra Elements are arranged in this way.
With your css, this is the result in the desktop (it’s ok)
But on mobile I continue to have the double display of the social icon.
I saw that if I place social icon in the Main Header Area, your css also works correctly on Mobile.
But in my case I would like to keep both the social icon and the wplm flags positioned at the top bar left of the header. If this is possible…Best regards
OrianoHi Mike,
Yes, I see.
I was just hoping there was a solution to mask the product link under the “comma” character.
The sequence of <link Author1><“, ” link product,><link Author 2><“, ” link product><link Author 3 etc…> risks creating a bit of confusion among users.However, I have now used your CSS to give the comma the same color as the authors’ names, so that the comma doesn’t attract too much attention.
Tomorrow I will insert the functions and CSS used on the stage site, on the production site, to see how it behaves.Best regards,
OrianoHello Mike, commas have product link.
The ideal would be for the commas not to contain links (as happens on the individual product page),
to avoid possible confusion.
It would be possible?Best regards,
OrianoHi Mike,
Would it be possible, in the product grid, not to have the product link on the comma (between one author and another)?Best regards
OrianoHi Mike,
I have now found an error, which I don’t know if it is caused by the last intervention made, or if it was an error that was also present before this last change.When a product/book has more than one author, for example “Author #1, Author #2, Author #3, in the single product the links of the three author names correctly refer to the respective pages of the two authors.
However, when the same product is displayed within the product grid, the links of the three authors (Author #1, Author #2, Author #3) are all redirected to the page of the last author (Author #3) :(See the details in the Private Content.
Best regards
OrianoGood morning Mike, and thanks for your help.
Your “function” aligns the author names, but also aligns the “price” :(
Is it possible to have only the authors’ names aligned, and the price instead continue to be on a new line?
Best regards,
OrianoHi Mike,
While waiting to receive a response from “Motopress”, I did a local installation on Mamp, I imported the database of the site in production (see site url in the Private Content), then I installed and activated Enfold.For the moment I have not seen any real compatibility problems.
The big problem is the formatting of the plugin’s post taxonomies (Accomodation).
Unfortunately, all the work you did in your demo cannot be used with the Motopress plugin :(
And therefore, to make the booking’s content pleasant and captivating, there is a lot of css work to do :(The ideal… sorry if I say it,
but it would be for Enfold to release another Hotel demo that uses the (free) MotoPress plugin.But I understand that I am making an unacceptable request on your part 😳.
Best regards,
OrianoHello Mike,
I contacted MotoPress support, to ask if I can use their plugin Hotel Booking Pro (I need the PRO version services 😳 ) on Enfold.
I hope to have a positive response.
Best regards
OrianoHi Mike
> Ok, so it is working correctly now, shall we close this thread then?
yes.Thank you very much.
Best regards,
OrianoHi Mike, sorry for my late reply, to see the stage site, see the info in Private Content.
The URL below the author’s name indicates the product page, but if you click on the name, you are then redirected to the author’s page.
It seems to me that it is working correctly now.Best regards,
OrianoHi,
the director of the “publishing house” gave me the URL of the site that has the solution he was looking for. I put the sati in “private content”.Oriano
-
AuthorPosts