Hi Victoria,

Thank you!

All the best,

Ok, thank you!

OK, we have already solved. The problem was in the fact that the old favicon (different favicon) was selected in the Customize mode. However, I would say the changing favicon via WP administration (Enfold Child Theme Options) should work in the same way.

Hi Basilis,

thanks for your suggestion, unfortunately, this plugin is 4-year old (https://wordpress.org/plugins/advanced-widgets/) I do not want to risk that this plugin causes some other problem which we explore later. Any other tips?

Thank you.

Sorry, I have just re-uploaded the following file https://www.sketchengine.eu/wp-content/uploads/search_form_ruskell.png (1162×202; 27 kB) but when I look at its thumbnail https://www.sketchengine.eu/wp-content/uploads/search_form_ruskell-768×134.png it has 60 kB. I am using the code above in the following format:

function av_return_100(){ return 75;
     add_filter('jpeg_quality', 'av_return_100');
     add_filter('wp_editor_set_quality', 'av_return_100');
};

I cannot see that it will work properly.

Hi,

no changes happened. I am using the following code in our function.php file within the child folder of Enfold theme:

function av_return_100(){ return 60; }
add_filter('jpeg_quality', 'av_return_100');
add_filter('wp_editor_set_quality', 'av_return_100');

and I commented the following code in the functions-enfold.php file within the original folder of Enfold theme:

#if( ! function_exists( 'av_return_100' ) )
#{
#       /**
#       * Sets the default image to 100% quality for more beautiful images when used in conjunction with img optimization plugins
#       *
#       * @since 4.3
#       * @added_by Kriesi
#       */
#       function av_return_100(){ return 100; }
#       add_filter('jpeg_quality', 'av_return_100');
#       add_filter('wp_editor_set_quality', 'av_return_100');
#}

How can I do so that it works?

Hi,

thank you, regenerating works now. But the size was not reduced. My original file has dimension 1500×1000 with the quality 90 and the size 145 kB. https://www.sketchengine.eu/wp-content/uploads/main-image-5.jpg
When I see the thumbnails (the quality 75, I tried also 50 and 5 and there was no difference) the thumbnails have the following sizes:
dimensions 1500×1000 – 414 kB
dimensions 1030×687 – 432 kB

It seems to me that it does not work because the sizes were preserved.

Hi Basilis,

you don’t solve our problem. The solution is not to use a plugin of the third party, because the pictures are maximally optimized while preserving the quality. The only solution, which I can see, is to upload the image in all dimension we need, but it is not very practical.
The example below shows that automatic modifying of pictures by Enfold does not work very well. I would guess that using another dimension (smaller) from my original one the result size in bytes will not bigger or not too much, but the reality is different.

https://www.sketchengine.eu/wp-content/uploads/main-image-5-min.jpg (154 kB; dimension 1500×1000) – original file
https://www.sketchengine.eu/wp-content/uploads/main-image-5-min-1500×1000.jpg (414 kB; dimension 1500×1000) – modified file by Enfold
https://www.sketchengine.eu/wp-content/uploads/main-image-5-min-1210×423 (330 kB; dimension 1210×423) – modified file by Enfold
https://www.sketchengine.eu/wp-content/uploads/main-image-5-min-1500×630 (405 kB; dimension 1500×630) – modified file by Enfold
https://www.sketchengine.eu/wp-content/uploads/main-image-5-min-845×684.jpg (359 kB; dimension 845×684) – modified file by Enfold

Thank you too! I definitely leave Google testing. Anyway, your review shows that Minify JavaScript and Inline small CSS are rated with the grade E in comparison with the preview version 4.2.3 of Enfold. So how can I understand the minification and optimization JS and CSS in the current version of Enfold?
Also, I have noticed that pictures which are resized by Enfold/WP are greater in the size than their original files, even though the modified picture is smaller, e.g.
https://www.sketchengine.eu/wp-content/uploads/cornelsen-min-180×180.png
vs the bigger original picture
https://www.sketchengine.eu/wp-content/uploads/cornelsen-min.png
Best,

Hey Rikard,

thank you for sending this tool. But how does Google compute speed loading of our website? I would not like to find a tool which shows better time, I would like to have the best time on Google because most of users come from Google on our website. When Google penalize our website due to the size it may not help us that our website is loaded faster via another tool.

I would like to open the video in a new tab (on Youtube).

Hello Mike,

after a longer time we are back with detailed information.

The problem is, that WP sends emails (via PHPMailer) with the header “From: (Email address hidden if logged out) “. The mail is send via our mailservers, but if the domain has DMARC policy enabled and the receiving servers (Google in our case) test this, the mail is not delivered. For Google it seem, that our servers send emails for domain whaever.com, but whaever.com DMARC policy says something else. We already have this problem with yahoo.com (and other, who has DMARC).

So we need the WP plugin set up from mail address to (Email address hidden if logged out) to satisfy the DMARC.

This does not work either. Please check here https://www.lexicalcomputing.cz/corpus-structures/#toggle-id-1

Please provide us with a solution that will work. Please give me your email so that I can set you up as a user on the website. This would make things easier. Thank you.