Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Hey Yigit,
find it below
Hey Vinay,
I must have missed that min-width issue. My bad.
It´s working fine now. Thanks a lot.
Cheers
MichaelHi Vinay,
yes, I had to remove it but now I added it again. Find the login credentials in the private section.Cheers
MichaelHi Vinay,
thanks for the great support…works almost ;-)
Pls take a look at http://www.dev2.foto-shooting.ch/
You can see that the submenues are hidden in the mobile menu but there is no way to bring them up (make them visible and clickable) again. Also there is a yellow (golden) square qith a plus sign when you hover a menu item that has sub-items in the regular desktop view.
Looks like we are on a good way but it still needs some minor improvements.
Best
MichaelGood opportunity to enhance the mobile menu in a future update of Enfold (as requested by many users anyway).
Thanks anyway.
Cheers
MichaelNo big thing, Yigit. I´ gonna use Gravityforms instead which I have a dev license for.
Hi Ismael,
yessss…it works now. See https://www.der-prinz.de/ueber-uns/
Thanks mate. You can close the thread
Great. Thanks
@guenni007: You got mail
This is what I did now in the socket of http://www.der-prinz.de
/* START Pounding heart animation */
@keyframes color_change {
from { color: #999; }
to { color: #cc0000; }
}
@keyframes pound {
to { transform: scale(1.4); }
}.heart::before {
content: ” \e806 “;
font-family: entypo-fontello;
font-size: 13px;
position: relative;
top: 1px;
animation: color_change 1s infinite alternate, pound 1s infinite alternate;
display: inline-block
}
/* END Pounding heart animation */Thanks Guenni007 for pushing me into the right direction
Great but yours (on your test-site) is not changing size it´s changing color. How does that work?
(reminder to myself: need to dip deeper into advanced CSS techniques…)
Cool. Doesn´t seem so dirty to me ;-)
I like the “pumping”. Is that a CSS transition?
Hi,
take a look at this little screencast. The first image is an image inside a section element with the proposed css solution to make it really 100%. The image is 1500 px wide so that works on a 1440×900 px resolution an lower.
The second image is a full-width slider element with the same image of 1500 px width as the only slide that of course also works as expected.
At around 13 Seconds in the video I´m expanding the browser window to more than 1500 px and you can see that the first image doesn´t get bigger than 1500 px whilst the image in the FW-Slider stays fullwidth no matter how big the screen gets. And that is what I want to achieve with a regular image.
Of course I could use an image that is e.g 4000 px wide which will cover potentially any monitor size out there but I don´t want to use such big images for obvious reasons ;-)
Cheers
MichaelGreat. This was the solution.Unfortunately not perfect for images because when the image is 1500 px wide it will work for most screens because they are smaller than 1500 px. If the screen size exceeds 1500px the image doesn´t get bigger to fill the screen width.
A background image can be triggered with CSS background-size:cover but that does not work for a regular image.
- This reply was modified 7 years, 11 months ago by Michael Oeser.
Hey Vinay,
as I wrote in my initial post: “Section background does not do the job for me.”
I need the full image to display and if I use a section bg it will crop the image. If I define a specific height of the section this height will also apply to mobile devices and the image will be far too large (high) on those devices. So no option for a proper result.
Seems like the full width slider currently is the only way to go. Even if a slider is a bit too overdone for a single image and if you look at this page https://www.der-prinz.de/portfolio-item/der-prinz-logo-und-branding-2016/ I had to use 5 sliders to achieve the look I wanted.
Any other good idea?
Cheers
MichaelOctober 31, 2016 at 10:06 am in reply to: Compatibility issues with WooCommerce Geman Market #706052Issue solved. Needed to simply increase PHP memory and now everything seems to work fine.
Thanks anyway.Cheers
MichaelHi Yigit,
find the credentials in the private section.
The site is already live except the shop pages (they are hidden behind a coming soon plugin). You are allowed to switch off the plugins as long as no content gets destroyed by this (like product pages and settings). But you will recognize that it´s the German Market extension that causes the issue.
Isn´t there a plugin available for Enfold that fixes compatibility issues with German Market and Enfold? I think I read about it somewhere but I can´t remember where.
Cheers
MichaelHi guys,
I don´t wanna push my thread but normally you are faster with responses. Any news on this?
Thanks Guenni but I´m not expecting a solution from you. And the footer thing is not related to the slider thing. Those are two different issues.
Whilst the footer is a custom requirement by me and I´m happy if someone can assis but I´m not expecting it, the slider thing is an already existing function/option of Enfold because the slider can be set to “fixed” and that works in all browsers except Firefox. Well at least it basically works but it shows an inaccurate behaviour on mobile devices as I already mentioned in my previous post.
So this is obviously buggy and I´m expecting the Kriesi team to find a fix for that.
is there any progress in this case?
There is another issue with this solution and with the fixed background of the fulls-screen slider anyway.
If you look at https://dev.der-prinz.com/enfold/ in a desktop browser and on a smartphone screen there is one huge issue on the smartphone screen: the image is not resized to fit it is displayed in full size which makes it unusable at all. see desktopn and iPhone screenshot attached.
Desktop: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4814298/desktop.png
iPhone: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4814298/iphone.jpgAny solution? Seems like this feature is a bit too buggy yet.
- This reply was modified 8 years ago by Michael Oeser.
Jepp. Jetzt geht´s. Klasse gemacht.
Ich hab das mal als Feature Request reingegeben. Mal schauen, ob das irgendwann als Option kommt ;-)
Cool, aber bei mir funktioniert das nicht. Keine Ahnung warum.
Naja, letztlich wäre es halt einfach schön, wenn diese Funktion in den Theme Optionen schaltbar wäre, wie bei Jupiter. Ich bin echt ein großer Freund von Enfold, aber teilweise hinkt es bei den Funktionen anderen schwer hinterher.
Gruß
MichaelJepp. Jetzt passt es bei Huth. Bin aber mal gespannt, wie Du das gemacht hast.
Naja, wenn man genau hinschaut, ist es durchaus das Gleiche. An die Kombination aus z-index und fixed position hatte ich auch gedacht, hab es aber nicht hinbekommen.
Meinst Du hier? http://webers-testseite.de/huth
Dann ist es NICHT das was ich suche.Ich meine das hier: https://dev.der-prinz.com/jupiter/
Hey Guenni007,
this looks very close to what I want. Except I want the socket and the footer to work like the socket does in your example.
By the way I also like the effect with the “overlapinng” logo.
Cheers
MichaelHey there,
in fact Guenni007 is right. After the recent Firefox update the solution desn´t work anymore. That is really weired. Any suggestions?
Cheers
MichaelThe footer ist still an “issue” check out this topic: https://kriesi.at/support/topic/fixed-curtain-footer/
Hi Ismael,
thanks for the response but it doesn´t work. Check out https://dev.der-prinz.com/enfold/ where I have added what you suggested. It fixes the footer and socket to the bottom but the content before the footer doesn´t cover the footer but it scrolls below the footer.
Any other suggestions?
Cheers
MichaelHey,
that´s awesome. It works. Thanks a lot for your support. Hope Kriesi can fix it in the theme for good.
Cheers
Michael -
AuthorPosts