Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Thanks for the response Yigit,
That worked to make the 1/2 column elements full width, but making the color section 100% did not impose full height on the contained 1/2 column elements. You can preview the result at the URL I provided, although ignore what’s below the fold as I am experimenting with different methods. Below is a comp of what I’m trying to accomplish. I haven’t found a way to create this with the ALB yet. Any approach to accomplish this would be appreciated.
Thanks
Been working on the site and the URL for this page has changed. Still wondering if there is a solution. I have updated the URL in the private content.
Hey Basilis,
Link attached in the private content. I’m not dead set on using a grid row to accomplish this, I just can’t find another way to get two 50% image columns full height. If you can think of a different way to accomplish the same thing in Enfold, or a way to make the Grid Row work, I’d appreciate any help you can provide.
Thanks in advance.
I fixed it. Layerslider was not accepting my “height: auto” value under “Layouts & Position” for the background image. I put the following in my style.css child to override and it fixed it:
img.ls-l.ls-preloaded {
height: auto !important;
}No idea why LS is ignoring that field.
Thanks for the suggestion. I am on the latest build of Enfold and WP, and have performed troubleshooting with all plugins turned off, and the problem still exists. The only thing out of date is Layerslider 5.4.0 (5.5.0 is current), but 5.4.0 is what’s shipping with the latest version of Enfold. I have also tried creating a slideshow from scratch, and it’s still behaving strangely. There seems to be something wrong with the responsive capabilities of the slider.
The responsive switch under “Slider Settings” doesn’t seem to do anything. Whether it is on or off, the slider behaves the same. I’ve seen erratic behavior in the past with it sometimes only making the background image responsive, but the slider height was static.
URL in private content.
Thank you for the help.
Hey Rikard,
So I made a bare-bones version and am still noticing some weird behavior. The strangest seems to be that when I turn the responsive switch to “on” in Slider Settings, the background image becomes responsive but the slider itself remains static height. However, if I add a “responsive under” value into the slider settings, the slider becomes responsive but deforms imagery. Furthermore, the preview of the slider is showing different results than production. I’m fairly familiar with HTML and CSS, and have done my due diligence with browser dev inspectors, but to no avail. Details in private content.
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated! I’m genuinely baffled what is causing this.
Thanks Rikard,
Credentials attached. Do you actually edit the site or document your changes? I’m a little nervous giving out keys to a live site, not knowing what changes might be made.
Thanks for the help.
Thanks for the reply. So, essentially, Offset Number can’t be used with pagination because of foundational code? Would a “Load More” function resolve this? Just thinking out loud. For an end user, it seems silly to have a feature that can’t be used in conjunction with something as common as pagination.
Thanks for your time!
Thanks Yigit,
Unfortunately that didn’t work either. For the sake of testing appropriately, I turned off all plugins, tried it in the Quick CSS field, as well as in the child’s style.css. Thanks for the attempt, I’ll just be sticking with the fixed header now.
Thanks,
It’s definitely related to the floating header, as the fixed header does not have the issue. Because this is a low priority bug on my end, I’m just going to leave it a fixed header for now. If this issue gets “fixed” (resolved) in the future then I’ll switch back, but a fixed header will work just as well.
